IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v11y1991i2p119-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of a Rapid Screen for Streptococcal Pharyngitis on Clinical Decision Making in the Emergency Department

Author

Listed:
  • Jerris R. Hedges
  • Bonita M. Singal
  • Jennifer L. Estep

Abstract

The impact of a rapid streptococcal screening test (RSS) on clinical decision making in the management of patients with acute pharyngitis was evaluated. Physicians managing 95 ambulatory patients with the complaint of sore throat were asked to estimate the probability of group A β-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis (GRABS) in each patient and whether they intended to treat with antibiotics both before and after the results of the RSS were known. Simultaneous throat cultures were obtained for 80 patients at the discretion of the treating physicians. Regression analysis revealed that the RSS result was an important independent predictor for the posttest decision to treat with antibiotics and for the estimated probability of disease. The mean absolute log-likelihood ratio was used to quantify the effect of the RSS on diagnostic certainty; a greater contribution to diagnostic certainty occurred when the RSS was positive. Physicians would have prescribed an antibiotic 49 times without the benefit of the RSS and prescribed an antibiotic 48 times given the RSS result. Without the RSS, the treatment decision contradicted the throat culture result in 25 cases. With the RSS, this occurred in 26 cases. The RSS, while influencing decision making, especially when positive, did not decrease the use of antibiotics.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerris R. Hedges & Bonita M. Singal & Jennifer L. Estep, 1991. "The Impact of a Rapid Screen for Streptococcal Pharyngitis on Clinical Decision Making in the Emergency Department," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 11(2), pages 119-124, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:11:y:1991:i:2:p:119-124
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9101100209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9101100209
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9101100209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:11:y:1991:i:2:p:119-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.