IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v10y1990i2p126-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Effectiueness of Quality Assurance Screening Using Large but Imperfect Databases

Author

Listed:
  • Michael B. Pine
  • David F. Rogers
  • David Morgan
  • Robert H. Beller

Abstract

To examine the effect of imprecise classification of patient risk (severity of illness) on an otherwise highly accurate quality assurance screening technique, data on clinical outcomes were generated for a simulated hospital system consisting of 108 facilities treating approx imately 565,000 patients a year. In these simulations, marked differences in facility size, casemix distribution, and quality of care were combined with random variations in outcome. Pooled data for all 108 facilities were used to create algorithms that combined 468 discrete patient risk classifications into either ten or three groups with broad, overlapping ranges of patient-specific risks of unfavorable clinical results. When derived algorithms were applied to independently generated facility-specific data, the ability to identify hospital systems with and without quality of care problems was maintained with ten, but not with three, risk groups. However, even three moderately heterogeneous risk groups were sufficient to preserve a high degree of sensitivity and specificity in screening for potential quality of care problems within individual facilities. Thus, outcome-based quality assurance screening can be highly accurate in actual health care situations in which only imprecise estimations of patient-specific risk can be achieved. Key words: quality assurance; simulation; health care outcomes; casemix correction; risk adjustment; indirect standardization; clinical indicators; provider comparisons; database development; healthcare monitoring. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:126- 134)

Suggested Citation

  • Michael B. Pine & David F. Rogers & David Morgan & Robert H. Beller, 1990. "Potential Effectiueness of Quality Assurance Screening Using Large but Imperfect Databases," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 10(2), pages 126-134, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:10:y:1990:i:2:p:126-134
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9001000207
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9001000207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:10:y:1990:i:2:p:126-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.