IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v24y2009i4p299-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering Glasgow's Tenants through Community Ownership?

Author

Listed:
  • Kim McKee

Abstract

Post 1997, stock transfer has been pivotal to the housing and regeneration agenda of the New Labour government, both at the UK and devolved level. Although a heavily researched policy area, stock transfer research has tended to focus quite narrowly on the perspectives of policymakers, practitioners or members of the transfer association's governing body. To address this research gap and focus more explicitly on the voices of local residents, this paper draws on the case study of the unique two-stage Glasgow housing stock transfer in order to explore ‘community ownership’ and ‘tenant empowerment’ from the perspective of ‘lay’ tenants. Political ambitions for direct democracy and communitarian endeavour have been central to stock transfer agendas in Scotland, where the policy has developed quite distinctly compared with the rest of the UK. Focus group research with tenants in Glasgow, however, highlights that empowerment was not an important priority for tenants at the point of transfer; that the transfer has delivered mixed outcomes in terms of local tenant control; and on the key issue of support for ‘full’ community ownership tenants were unconvinced, and expressed a need for more information.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim McKee, 2009. "Empowering Glasgow's Tenants through Community Ownership?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 24(4), pages 299-309, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:24:y:2009:i:4:p:299-309
    DOI: 10.1080/02690940903026829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/02690940903026829
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02690940903026829?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guy Daly & Gerry Mooney & Lynne Poole & Howard Davis, 2005. "Housing Stock Transfer in Birmingham and Glasgow: The Contrasting Experiences of Two UK Cities," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 327-341.
    2. Kim McKee, 2007. "Community Ownership in Glasgow: The Devolution of Ownership and Control, or a Centralizing Process?," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 319-336.
    3. Guy Daly & Gerry Mooney & Lynne Poole & Howard Davis, 2005. "Housing Stock Transfer in Birmingham and Glasgow: The Contrasting Experiences of Two UK Cities," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 327-341, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Louise Lawson & Ade Kearns, 2010. "‘Community Empowerment’ in the Context of the Glasgow Housing Stock Transfer," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(7), pages 1459-1478, June.
    2. Ejiogu, Amanze & Ambituuni, Ambisisi & Ejiogu, Chibuzo, 2021. "Accounting for accounting’s role in the neoliberalization processes of social housing in England: A Bourdieusian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. John McCormack, 2009. "`Better the Devil You Know': Submerged Consciousness and Tenant Participation in Housing Stock Transfers," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(2), pages 391-411, February.
    4. Elspeth Graham & David Manley & Rosemary Hiscock & Paul Boyle & Joe Doherty, 2009. "Mixing Housing Tenures: Is it Good for Social Well-being?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 139-165, January.
    5. Smyth, Stewart, 2012. "Contesting public accountability: A dialogical exploration of accountability and social housing," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 230-243.
    6. Camilla Baba & Ade Kearns & Emma McIntosh & Carol Tannahill & James Lewsey, 2017. "Is empowerment a route to improving mental health and wellbeing in an urban regeneration (UR) context?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(7), pages 1619-1637, May.
    7. David Kim Hin Ho & Eddie Chi-man Hui & Muhammad Faishal Bin Ibrahim, 2009. "Asset Value Enhancement of Singapore’s Public Housing Main Upgrading Programme (MUP) Policy: A Real Option Analysis Approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(11), pages 2329-2361, October.
    8. Derek McGhee & Sue Heath & Paulina Trevena, 2013. "Post-Accession Polish Migrants—Their Experiences of Living in ‘Low-Demand’ Social Housing Areas in Glasgow," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(2), pages 329-343, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:24:y:2009:i:4:p:299-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.