IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v60y2023i6p1002-1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Material military power: A country-year measure of military power, 1865–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Souva

    (Department of Political Science, Florida State University)

Abstract

Military power is central to diplomacy and much of international relations, yet common quantitative measures have limited surface validity. This limitation stems from focusing on latent power and only indirectly incorporating major weapon systems. I contend that weapons are central to military power and present a new measure of country military power based primarily on armaments. The measure includes major naval, air and land weapons as well as nuclear weapons and ballistic missile capability. I examine the surface, content and context validity of the measure and compare it to existing measures. I show that this measure of material military power (MMP) has more surface and context validity than alternative measures. I find that MMP better predicts war outcomes, better accounts for militarized threats, and performs well as a control variable for country power.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Souva, 2023. "Material military power: A country-year measure of military power, 1865–2019," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(6), pages 1002-1009, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:60:y:2023:i:6:p:1002-1009
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433221112970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433221112970
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433221112970?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lyall, Jason & Wilson, Isaiah, 2009. "Rage Against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(1), pages 67-106, January.
    2. Robert J. Carroll & Brenton Kenkel, 2019. "Prediction, Proxies, and Power," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(3), pages 577-593, July.
    3. Weeks, Jessica L., 2012. "Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 106(2), pages 326-347, May.
    4. Richard J. Saunders & Mark Souva, 2020. "Command of the skies: An air power dataset," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(6), pages 735-755, November.
    5. Dan Reiter & Allan C. Stam & Michael C. Horowitz, 2016. "A Revised Look at Interstate Wars, 1816–2007," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 60(5), pages 956-976, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephan Haggard, 2014. "Liberal Pessimism: International Relations Theory and the Emerging Powers," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Travis W. Endicott, 2020. "Combat Experience and the Foreign Policy Positions of Veterans," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1413-1429, July.
    3. Bjørnskov, Christian & Pfaff, Katharina, 2021. "Differences matter: The effect of coup types on physical integrity rights," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Kazuhiro Obayashi, 2014. "Information, rebel organization and civil war escalation: The case of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 21-40, March.
    5. Vipin Narang & Caitlin Talmadge, 2018. "Civil-military Pathologies and Defeat in War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(7), pages 1379-1405, August.
    6. Alexander Baturo, 2016. "Cursus Honorum: Personal Background, Careers and Experience of Political Leaders in Democracy and Dictatorship—New Data and Analyses," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 138-157.
    7. Beath,Andrew & Christia,Fotini & Enikolopov,Ruben & Beath,Andrew & Christia,Fotini & Enikolopov,Ruben, 2012. "Winning hearts and minds through development ? evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6129, The World Bank.
    8. Carlson Lisa J. & Dacey Raymond, 2013. "An Overview of the Influence of Domestic Constraints on Crisis Initiation and Termination," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 19(3), pages 403-413, December.
    9. Marius Mehrl, 2023. "Female combatants and rebel group behaviour: Evidence from Nepal," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(3), pages 260-280, May.
    10. Benjamin Krick & Jonathan Petkun & Mara Revkin, 2023. "What Determines Military Legitimacy? Evidence from the Battle of Mosul in Iraq," HiCN Working Papers 402, Households in Conflict Network.
    11. Helge Holtermann, 2012. "Explaining the Development–Civil War Relationship," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(1), pages 56-78, February.
    12. Justin M. Conrad & Kevin T. Greene & James Igoe Walsh & Beth Elise Whitaker, 2019. "Rebel Natural Resource Exploitation and Conflict Duration," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(3), pages 591-616, March.
    13. Matthew Hauenstein, 2020. "The conditional effect of audiences on credibility," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(3), pages 422-436, May.
    14. Marvin L. King & David R. Galbreath & Alexandra M. Newman & Amanda S. Hering, 2020. "Combining regression and mixed-integer programming to model counterinsurgency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 287-320, September.
    15. Ore Koren & Bumba Mukherjee, 2022. "Integrated Militias Can Increase the Risk of Civil War Renewal," HiCN Working Papers 366, Households in Conflict Network.
    16. Steven Chen, 2023. "A counterinsurgent (COIN) framework to defend against consumer activists," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(4), pages 275-301, July.
    17. Schwuchow, Soeren, 2018. "Extractive Institutions, Choking Taxes, and War: On the (Beneficial) Impact of Inequality in Autocracies," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181530, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    18. Stadelmann, David & Portmann, Marco & Eichenberger, Reiner, 2015. "Military careers of politicians matter for national security policy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 142-156.
    19. Susan Hannah Allen & Carla Martinez Machain, 2019. "Understanding the impact of air power," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(5), pages 545-558, September.
    20. Florian Justwan, 2017. "Trusting Publics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(3), pages 590-614, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    armaments; measurement; power;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:60:y:2023:i:6:p:1002-1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.