IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v35y1998i2p231-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cumulation, Evaluation and the Research Process: Investigating the Diffusion of Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Harvey Star

    (Department of Government and International Studies, University of South Carolina)

  • Randolph M. Siverson

    (Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis)

Abstract

Broad analytic assessments of research areas can be invaluable for scholars because they can inform the ongoing feedback process between theory and research that is at the heart of scientific inquiry. Unfortunately, Simowitz's (1998) evaluation of diffusion analyses of conflict has several problematic characteristics that make it less useful to the research community than might otherwise be the case. The major difficulties we see in her article are: (1) the forced, idiosyncratic synthesis of the standard of scientific progress and its consequent application; (2) the excessively unilinear conception of scientific process (and progress); (3) the inaccurate understanding of some of the research on war diffusion; (4) the failure to include in the evaluation several studies and results that might have led to different conclusions; and (5) the absence of any constructive suggestion of where research on the topic of war and conflict diffusion might profitably be directed.

Suggested Citation

  • Harvey Star & Randolph M. Siverson, 1998. "Cumulation, Evaluation and the Research Process: Investigating the Diffusion of Conflict," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 35(2), pages 231-237, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:35:y:1998:i:2:p:231-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/35/2/231.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:35:y:1998:i:2:p:231-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.