IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v34y1997i3p325-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rhetorical Strategies and the Misleading Nature of Attacks on `Postmodernism': A Reply to Østerud

Author

Listed:
  • Heikki Patomäki

    (Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki)

Abstract

As a reaction to Østerud's attack on `postmodernism', it is argued that post-structuralism, Critical Theory and critical realism should be seen as important responses to the crisis of positivism and modernity. Even the few `postmodernists' who would be willing to defend the idea that it is only thought and discourses that matter or that `anything goes' or that we should stop talking about truths have been able to contribute to transformations of understandings in a constructive way. Even though some of the actual critical-reflective analyses have been rather conventional, there is much room for producing even better critical-reflectivist studies in the future. However, Østerud's loaded terms have effects of power: there is an unjustified tendency to silence the emerging latemodern interpretative and explanatory possibilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Heikki Patomäki, 1997. "The Rhetorical Strategies and the Misleading Nature of Attacks on `Postmodernism': A Reply to Østerud," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 34(3), pages 325-329, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:34:y:1997:i:3:p:325-329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/34/3/325.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:34:y:1997:i:3:p:325-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.