Author
Abstract
This study tested the proposition that university undergraduates would have higher empowerment scores with regard to advocating for antinuclear rather than pronuclear weapons issues. In addition, empowerment would be a determining factor of antinuclear but not of pronuclear activism among these students. Two components of empowerment were assessed in a decision-making task, namely, intentions to deal with the problems of nuclear weapons and confidence in those decisions. The intentions to deal with nuclear weapons issues were assessed by the students' endorsements of coping actions to deal with problem situations presented on a computer. Perceived empowerment was measured by their self-rated confidence in the correctness of the decisions. Concerns or worries about nuclear issues were measured by the frequency of self-reported antinuclear and pronuclear thoughts. The students' previous activities related to antinuclear and pronuclear advocacy were also measured with a questionnaire. The major findings were that antinuclear concerns, intentions to engage in antinuclear coping actions, and confidence in the decisions all contributed to the determination of antinuclear activism. In contrast, only pronuclear concerns determined pronuclear activism. It was concluded that empowerment is situationally determined or limited to specific issues in any particular group. The findings were discussed with reference to increasing the activism of citizens through public policies that are sensitive to the circumstances of particular groups and provide organized support for the development of empowerment on specific peace issues.
Suggested Citation
Peter Horvath, 1996.
"Antinuclear and Pronuclear Empowerment and Activism,"
Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 33(2), pages 137-152, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:joupea:v:33:y:1996:i:2:p:137-152
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:33:y:1996:i:2:p:137-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.