IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v21y1984i1p17-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freedom of Information in National Security Affairs: A Comparative Study of Norway and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Nils Petter Gleditsch

    (International Peace Research Institute, Oslo)

  • Einar Høgetveit

    (International Peace Research Institute, Oslo)

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that there is much less secrecy in the United States than in its allies across the Atlantic. This paper sets out to substantiate this thesis by means of a comparison between Norway and the US. The Freedom of Information Act and the Executive Order on classification are compared to their Norwegian counterparts and on a number of points the US rules are found to be more liberal. Some material is presented on administrative practices in the two countries. This comparison indicates that the US Freedom of Information Act is used very extensively and increasingly so, whereas the use of the Norwegian Act is not only lower, but declining. 19 possible explanations for the greater secrecy of Norway are offered, and it is suggested that these may serve as a basis for a wider comparative study. Finally, the possibility of convergence is discussed, on the basis of a trend towards a more liberal practice in Norway, while the US has swung back from the post-Watergate openness. It is nevertheless maintained that the US remains well ahead of Norway in its openness on national security issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Nils Petter Gleditsch & Einar Høgetveit, 1984. "Freedom of Information in National Security Affairs: A Comparative Study of Norway and the United States," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 21(1), pages 17-45, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:21:y:1984:i:1:p:17-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/21/1/17.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:21:y:1984:i:1:p:17-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.