IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v16y2019i3p297-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Monte Carlo tradeoff analysis to guide resource investment in threat detection systems: From forensic to prospective investigations

Author

Listed:
  • Shelley Cazares
  • Jeffrey A Snyder
  • Joan Cartier
  • Felicia Sallis-Peterson
  • John Fregeau

Abstract

The Department of Defense has invested in threat detection systems, consisting of sensors and algorithms to collect and process data on potential threats. We performed a Monte Carlo tradeoff analysis to determine the optimal combination of sensor versus algorithm capability for an airborne wide area motion imagery (WAMI) system used to identify insurgents detonating improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in urban environments. We created a computational model of the WAMI system, including the camera and algorithms for processing, exploitation, and dissemination. We also synthesized input data consisting of objects and activities taking place in a city over two days. We compared the model’s output versus input to quantify its overall value to the counter-IED mission. We exercised the model twice: forensically to identify insurgents after the IED explosions and prospectively to identify insurgents as early as possible beforehand. Although better sensors led to better intermediate results, they did not always lead to greater overall value. Once the number of true positives saturated at its best possible value, the number of false positives continued to grow as the quality of the sensor improved. Similar results may occur for other scenarios in which threats are limited in number with low prevalence.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelley Cazares & Jeffrey A Snyder & Joan Cartier & Felicia Sallis-Peterson & John Fregeau, 2019. "A Monte Carlo tradeoff analysis to guide resource investment in threat detection systems: From forensic to prospective investigations," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 16(3), pages 297-320, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:297-320
    DOI: 10.1177/1548512917694966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548512917694966
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1548512917694966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:297-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.