IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jospec/v26y2025i1p3-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking in Incomplete Tournaments: The Generalized Win Percentage Method, Efficiency, and NCAA Football

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Leiva Bertrán

Abstract

I present a parsimonious family of scoring methods for ranking teams in incomplete tournaments. It is especially useful if teams play different number of games. I show that this family of scoring methods satisfies common sense theoretical properties studied by the literature on paired comparisons. I analyze it in terms of efficiency, defined as how close a scoring method comes to capturing what the teams’ win percentages would have been, in a complete tournament. Finally, using data on betting odds, I calibrate the family of scoring methods to match, as closely as possible, the actual rankings that were used to determine the teams that would go on to compete for the championship of the NCAA division 1 football tournament between 2011 and 2023. I find that the rankings used by the NCAA were generally efficient and I quantify the biases present in each year’s ranking.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Leiva Bertrán, 2025. "Ranking in Incomplete Tournaments: The Generalized Win Percentage Method, Efficiency, and NCAA Football," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 26(1), pages 3-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:3-34
    DOI: 10.1177/15270025241268738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15270025241268738
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15270025241268738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:3-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.