IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jodeso/v30y2014i4p389-414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Popular Fiction and Development Studies

Author

Listed:
  • David Lempert

    (International Development Consultant)

Abstract

The essay uses two recent works of fiction as a takeoff for a critique of Development Studies, suggesting that what is presented in the form of fiction is often closer to reality than what the discipline offers as fact. The review of two novels by former US Peace Corps volunteers offers clear examples of how fiction in the field of “development†can offer truths that are not presented in academic work. This essay suggests how fiction can help invigorate the discipline of Development Studies, offers a list of examples, and also suggests how fiction should not be used. This essay challenges scholars in the field to draw upon insights from fiction and to review fiction works while encouraging publishers to widen their perspectives and present works in new genres in the field of “development.†The essay also notes how related genres like development “diaries†can also be used as a reality check on the discipline and as a way to infuse new ideas into this field.

Suggested Citation

  • David Lempert, 2014. "Popular Fiction and Development Studies," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 30(4), pages 389-414, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jodeso:v:30:y:2014:i:4:p:389-414
    DOI: 10.1177/0169796X14550933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0169796X14550933
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0169796X14550933?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Lewis & Dennis Rodgers & Michael Woolcock, 2008. "The Fiction of Development: Literary Representation as a Source of Authoritative Knowledge," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 198-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Beer, 2014. "Hip-Hop as Urban and Regional Research: Encountering an Insider's Ethnography of City Life," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 677-685, March.
    2. Alfred Ndi, 2011. "Why Liberal Capitalism Has Failed to Stimulate a Democratic Culture in Africa," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 27(2), pages 177-200, June.
    3. David Lewis & Dennis Rodgers & Michael Woolcock, 2013. "The Projection of Development: Cinematic Representation as A(nother) Source of Authoritative Knowledge?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 383-397, March.
    4. Lucy Hewitt & Stephen Graham, 2015. "Vertical cities: Representations of urban verticality in 20th-century science fiction literature," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 923-937, April.
    5. Amrita Chhachhi & Alaka M. Basu, 2014. "Demography for the Public: Literary Representations of Population Research and Policy," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 813-837, September.
    6. Deval Desai & Mareike Schomerus, 2018. "‘There Was A Third Man…’: Tales from a Global Policy Consultation on Indicators for the Sustainable Development Goals," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(1), pages 89-115, January.
    7. Polly Stupples, 2014. "Creative contributions: The role of the arts and the cultural sector in development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 14(2), pages 115-130, April.
    8. Martine Buser & Christian Koch, 2014. "Tales of the Suburbs?—The Social Sustainability Agenda in Sweden through Literary Accounts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jodeso:v:30:y:2014:i:4:p:389-414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.