IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v66y2022i9p1676-1702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Brutality-Based Approach to Identifying State-Led Atrocities

Author

Listed:
  • David Cingranelli
  • Skip Mark
  • James B. Garvey
  • Jordan Hutt
  • Yuri Lee

Abstract

The comparative study of atrocities and atrocity prevention faces several obstacles including a lack of consensus on the universe of cases and too few cases to statistically test alternative theories. The brutality-based (BB) conception is based on the idea that widespread, state-led violations of physical integrity rights constitute an assault on the personhood and human dignity of the members of society— a mass atrocity. Applying this idea to all countries annually systematically identifies a larger number of atrocities and facilitates categorization into three levels of intensity. The BB methodology for generating annual atrocity lists is replicable and transparent. The findings show that, between 1981 and 2019, the frequency of atrocities as defined and identified by other projects has been decreasing, but BB atrocities have been increasing. The sequence of different types of widespread physical integrity violations suggests new avenues for research on atrocity occurrence, escalation, de-escalation, and cessation.

Suggested Citation

  • David Cingranelli & Skip Mark & James B. Garvey & Jordan Hutt & Yuri Lee, 2022. "A Brutality-Based Approach to Identifying State-Led Atrocities," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(9), pages 1676-1702, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:9:p:1676-1702
    DOI: 10.1177/00220027221077228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220027221077228
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00220027221077228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:9:p:1676-1702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.