IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v66y2022i2p272-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Atomic Ambiguity: Event Data Evidence on Nuclear Latency and International Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Eleonora Mattiacci
  • Rupal N. Mehta
  • Rachel Elizabeth Whitlark

Abstract

How does dual-use technology influence cooperation? This study explores how the development of nuclear latency (the technological precursors to nuclear weapons) affects U.S. cooperative overtures toward its possessors. We argue that the ambiguous nature of nuclear latency creates uncertainty about the intentions of its possessors and impacts cooperation. Using event data, we find that a state’s possession of overt lab-scale enrichment and reprocessing facilities is significantly correlated with greater cooperative overtures from the United States toward that country. These overtures may serve as effective tools to counter nuclear proliferation among these states. Yet, when latent states engage in a concerted effort to keep their facilities secret, both at the lab and a more advanced “pilot†stage, this relationship is reversed. These results carry important implications for the impact of emerging, dual-use technologies on international security broadly.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleonora Mattiacci & Rupal N. Mehta & Rachel Elizabeth Whitlark, 2022. "Atomic Ambiguity: Event Data Evidence on Nuclear Latency and International Cooperation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(2), pages 272-296, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:2:p:272-296
    DOI: 10.1177/00220027211036926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220027211036926
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00220027211036926?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jones, Benjamin T. & Mattiacci, Eleonora, 2019. "A Manifesto, in 140 Characters or Fewer: Social Media as a Tool of Rebel Diplomacy," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 739-761, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devorah Manekin & Reed M. Wood, 2020. "Framing the Narrative: Female Fighters, External Audience Attitudes, and Transnational Support for Armed Rebellions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(9), pages 1638-1665, October.
    2. Johannes Karreth, 2022. "Anjali Kaushlesh Dayal. 2021. Incredible commitments: How UN peacekeeping failures shape peace processes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 657-661, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:66:y:2022:i:2:p:272-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.