IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v65y2021i6p1039-1066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexibility and Firmness in Crisis Bargaining

Author

Listed:
  • Vesna Danilovic
  • Joe Clare

Abstract

Our study compares the efficacy of mixed bargaining strategies to strict coercion or accommodation. While mixed strategies can be approached from different conceptual angles, we focus on flexible and/or firm postures as signaling properties of bargaining. In our theory and empirical analysis, we show that the combination of firmness with flexibility on both sides, without necessarily scripted rules as in tit-for-tat, leads to peaceful resolution without unilateral concessions. Its opposite, resolute firmness is unlikely to make the opponent yield, as assumed in influential literature of the traditional canon. If anything, war is most likely when both sides opt for it. We provide the theoretical rationale for these expectations, which are validated in our empirical analysis of the ICB crisis dataset for the 1918 to 2015 period. Our study also points to the bargaining process as a potential causal mechanism between democracy and peace, and therefore has relevant implications for several research strands.

Suggested Citation

  • Vesna Danilovic & Joe Clare, 2021. "Flexibility and Firmness in Crisis Bargaining," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(6), pages 1039-1066, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:65:y:2021:i:6:p:1039-1066
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002721994174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002721994174
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002721994174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:65:y:2021:i:6:p:1039-1066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.