IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v62y2018i4p797-818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Balliet
  • Joshua M. Tybur
  • Junhui Wu
  • Christian Antonellis
  • Paul A. M. Van Lange

Abstract

Theories suggest that political ideology relates to cooperation, with conservatives being more likely to pursue selfish outcomes, and liberals more likely to pursue egalitarian outcomes. In study 1, we examine how political ideology and political party affiliation (Republican vs. Democrat) predict cooperation with a partner who self-identifies as Republican or Democrat in two samples before ( n = 362) and after ( n = 366) the 2012 US presidential election. Liberals show slightly more concern for their partners’ outcomes compared to conservatives (study 1), and in study 2 this relation is supported by a meta-analysis ( r = .15). However, in study 1, political ideology did not relate to cooperation in general. Both Republicans and Democrats extend more cooperation to their in-group relative to the out-group, and this is explained by expectations of cooperation from in-group versus out-group members. We discuss the relation between political ideology and cooperation within and between groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Balliet & Joshua M. Tybur & Junhui Wu & Christian Antonellis & Paul A. M. Van Lange, 2018. "Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(4), pages 797-818, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:62:y:2018:i:4:p:797-818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/62/4/797.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Munro, Kirstin & Tolley, George, 2018. "Property values and tax rates near spent nuclear fuel storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 433-442.
    2. Bartelt, Nadja, 2018. "Bundling in Internetmärkten: Ökonomische Besonderheiten, Wettbewerbseffekte und Regulierungsimplikationen," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 120, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:62:y:2018:i:4:p:797-818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.