IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v58y2014i2p307-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inducing Deterrence through Moral Hazard in Alliance Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Brett V. Benson

    (Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA)

  • Adam Meirowitz

    (Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA)

  • Kristopher W. Ramsay

    (Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA)

Abstract

Do military alliances foster aggressive behavior in allies to the point of undermining the security goal of the alliance? Like others, we find that alliance commitments may cause moral hazard because allies do not fully internalize the costs of actions that can lead to war. But unlike others, we show that the effect of moral hazard can improve security. Moral hazard can be the driving force behind generating deterrence and avoiding costly conflict. Aggressors may refrain from initiating crises if their target enjoys additional resources from its ally and so is more willing to fight back. So rather than incurring costs, moral hazard may be the very key to deterring potential aggressors and minimizing the risk of conflict. This behavior allows alliance partners to capture a “deterrence surplus,†which are the gains from avoiding conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Brett V. Benson & Adam Meirowitz & Kristopher W. Ramsay, 2014. "Inducing Deterrence through Moral Hazard in Alliance Contracts," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 58(2), pages 307-335, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:58:y:2014:i:2:p:307-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/58/2/307.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vesa Kanniainen, 2018. "Defence Commitment and Deterrence in the Theory of War," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 64(4), pages 617-638.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:58:y:2014:i:2:p:307-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.