IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v52y2008i5p737-764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediating the Mediation Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin L. Read

    (Politics Department, University of California, Santa Cruz)

  • Ethan Michelson

    (Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington)

Abstract

China's elaborate system of local mediation committees has piqued researchers' curiosity for decades and sparked an argument in these pages. Crucial questions—concerning how much mediation actually takes place, what kinds of disputes are mediated, who seeks mediation, and how successful it is—have gone unanswered for lack of data. This article addresses these issues using original surveys from Beijing and villages in six provinces, supplemented by participant-observation research on actual instances of mediation. We find that mediation is fairly common in the country-side while occurring in a narrow set of contexts in the city. Those who are actively involved in institutions of grassroots governance are much more likely than others to seek such remedies, and in rural China, women pursue it more than men do. Modernization may diminish the salience of this form of dispute resolution, yet it is far from extinct, even in contemporary society.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin L. Read & Ethan Michelson, 2008. "Mediating the Mediation Debate," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 52(5), pages 737-764, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:52:y:2008:i:5:p:737-764
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002708318920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002708318920
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002708318920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:52:y:2008:i:5:p:737-764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.