IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v50y2006i3p383-408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judging Transitional Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Marek M. Kaminski

    (Department of Political Science and Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine)

  • Monika Nalepa

    (Department of Political Science, Rice University)

Abstract

Truth revelation procedures are evaluated according to various normative criteria. The authors find the concepts of false conviction and false acquittal more adequate for such evaluation than the conformity with the rule of law and apply a useful classification of truth revelation procedures into incentive-based (ITRs) and evidence-based ones (ETRs). ITRs induce perpetrators and secret agents of the authoritarian regime to reveal the truth about their past, while ETRs rely exclusively on preserved evidence and victims’ testimonies. Using a simple decision-making model, the authors show that while both procedures are sensitive to the problem of falsified evidence, ITRs perform better with respect to revealing the identity of collaborators whose files were destroyed. Finally, they discuss the connection between ITRs and two modes of coming to terms with the past, endogenous and exogenous.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek M. Kaminski & Monika Nalepa, 2006. "Judging Transitional Justice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(3), pages 383-408, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:50:y:2006:i:3:p:383-408
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002706287046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002706287046
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002706287046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1989. "The Death of Communism," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 16-23, May.
    2. Helmke, Gretchen, 2002. "The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court–Executive Relations in Argentina Under Dictatorship and Democracy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(2), pages 291-303, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaewook Byeon & Iljoong Kim & Dongwon Lee, 2018. "Protest and property crime: political use of police resources and the deterrence of crime," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 181-196, April.
    2. Bernard H. Siegan, 1990. "Land Use Regulations Should Preserve Only Vital and Pressing Governmental Interests," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 127-158, Spring/Su.
    3. Andrés Mejía Acosta & María Caridad Araujo & Anibal Pérez-Liñán & Sebastian Saiegh, 2006. "Actores con veto, instituciones caprichosas y políticas de mala calidad: el proceso de diseño de políticas de Ecuador," Research Department Publications 3227, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    4. Andrés Mejía Acosta & María Caridad Araujo & Anibal Pérez-Liñán & Sebastian Saiegh, 2006. "Veto Players, Fickle Institutions and Low-Quality Policies: The Policymaking Process in Ecuador," Research Department Publications 3226, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    5. Jessica Maves Braithwaite & Joseph M Cox & Margaret Farry, 2022. "Tactics of resistance and post-conflict judicial independence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(6), pages 779-793, November.
    6. J Adams & C Staddon & M Walton-Roberts & J Glassman & S Cohen & J van Weesep, 1999. "Reviews: Asphalt Nation: How the Automobile Took over America and How We Can Take it Back, Environment and Society in Eastern Europe, Crossing Borders: Regional and Urban Perspectives on International," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(12), pages 2249-2258, December.
    7. Slobodan Lakic, 2012. "Corporatism As A Totalitaristic Foundation And Practicism," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 8(2), pages 275-293.
    8. Staton, Jeffrey K., 2004. "When Judges Go Public: The Selective Promotion of Case Results on the Mexican Supreme Court," University of California at San Diego, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies qt4jq0f4d4, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, UC San Diego.
    9. Emily Hencken Ritter & Courtenay R. Conrad, 2016. "Human rights treaties and mobilized dissent against the state," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 449-475, December.
    10. Cook, Thomas R. & Liu, Amy H., 2016. "Using Linguistic Networks to Explain Strength of Intellectual Property Rights," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 128-138.
    11. Michele Santoni & Francesco Zucchini, 2006. "Legislative output and the Constitutional Court in Italy," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 165-187, September.
    12. Matias J Iaryczower, 2005. "Essays in Political Influence," Levine's Working Paper Archive 618897000000000945, David K. Levine.
    13. Iaryczower, Matias & Spiller, Pablo T. & Tommasi, Mariano, 2006. "Judicial Lobbying: The Politics of Labor Law Constitutional Interpretation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 100(1), pages 85-97, February.
    14. Iaryczower, Matias & Lewis, Garrett & Shum, Matthew, 2013. "To elect or to appoint? Bias, information, and responsiveness of bureaucrats and politicians," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 230-244.
    15. Weede Erich, 2001. "Südkorea und Rußland: Wie man Wohlstand erarbeitet oder verspielt," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 52(1), pages 175-188, January.
    16. repec:gig:joupla:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:107-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:gig:joupla:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:37-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Darren Hawkins & Wade Jacoby, 2008. "Agent permeability, principal delegation and the European Court of Human Rights," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, March.
    19. Timur Kuran & Scott Lustig, 2012. "Judicial Biases in Ottoman Istanbul: Islamic Justice and Its Compatibility with Modern Economic Life," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(3), pages 631-666.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:50:y:2006:i:3:p:383-408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.