IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v50y2006i3p339-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forgiveness and Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Roman David

    (Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong)

  • Susanne Y.P. Choi

    (Department of Sociology, Chinese University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

This article examines major theoretical assumptions about forgiveness by victims of human rights abuses in the context of transitional justice in the Czech Republic. The authors hypothesize that forgiveness is facilitated by restoring equality between victims and perpetrators, namely: individual, social and political empowerment of victims; decreasing the superior position of perpetrators, especially through their punishment; and a repentant gesture of perpetrators towards victims, especially by apologizing. The results of path analysis confirm that religious belief, individual, social, and political empowerment, punishment, and apology directly promote forgiveness. This enables the authors to distinguish four types of forgiveness: religious, reparatory, retributive, and reconciliatory forgiveness. They suggest that policy interventions that promote forgiveness may not be mutually exclusive as often proposed in the dilemmas of transitional justice

Suggested Citation

  • Roman David & Susanne Y.P. Choi, 2006. "Forgiveness and Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(3), pages 339-367, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:50:y:2006:i:3:p:339-367
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002706286950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002706286950
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002706286950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Bendor & Roderick M. Kramer & Suzanne Stout, 1991. "When in Doubt..," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(4), pages 691-719, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier Compte & Andrew Postlewaite, 2007. "Effecting Cooperation," PIER Working Paper Archive 09-019, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 29 May 2009.
    2. Marc Harper & Vincent Knight & Martin Jones & Georgios Koutsovoulos & Nikoleta E Glynatsi & Owen Campbell, 2017. "Reinforcement learning produces dominant strategies for the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-33, December.
    3. Bart S. Vanneste & Douglas H. Frank, 2014. "Forgiveness in Vertical Relationships: Incentive and Termination Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1807-1822, December.
    4. Thomas Chadefaux & Dirk Helbing, 2012. "The Rationality of Prejudices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    5. Choi, Sukwoong & Kim, Wonjoon & Kim, Namil, 2022. "International alliance formations: The role of brokerage in technology competition networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 440-449.
    6. Evans, Alecia & Sesmero, Juan Pablo, 2022. "Noisy Payoffs in an Infinitely Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma – Experimental Evidence," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322434, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Amnon Rapoport & Darryl A Seale & Andrew M Colman, 2015. "Is Tit-for-Tat the Answer? On the Conclusions Drawn from Axelrod's Tournaments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    8. Kalle Pajunen, 2006. "Living in Agreement with a Contract: The Management of Moral and Viable Firm–Stakeholder Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 243-258, October.
    9. Howard Kunreuther & Gabriel Silvasi & Eric T. Bradlow & Dylan Small, 2007. "Deterministic and Stochastic Prisoner's Dilemma Games: Experiments in Interdependent Security," NBER Technical Working Papers 0341, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. M.C. Boerlijst & M.A. Nowak & K. Sigmund, 1997. "Equal Pay for all Prisoners/ The Logic of Contrition," Working Papers ir97073, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    11. K. Sigmund, 1998. "Complex Adaptive Systems and the Evolution of Reciprocation," Working Papers ir98100, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    12. Jay C. Brown, 2006. "The effects of behavioral and outcome feedback on prudent decision-making under conditions of present and future uncertainty," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 1, pages 76-85, July.
    13. Curtis S. Signorino, 1996. "Simulating International Cooperation under Uncertainty," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(1), pages 152-205, March.
    14. Pradiptyo, Rimawan & Sasmitasiwi, Banoon & Sahadewo, Gumilang Aryo, 2011. "Evidence of homo economicus? Findings from experiment on evolutionary prisoners' dilemma game," MPRA Paper 30480, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Craig D. Parks & Robert F. Henager & Shawn D. Scamahorn, 1996. "Trust and Reactions to Messages of Intent in Social Dilemmas," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(1), pages 134-151, March.
    16. Evans, Alecia & Sesmero, Juan, 2022. "Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with Correlated Noisy Payoffs: Theory and Experimental Evidence," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 322804, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Fisman, Raymond & Khanna, Tarun, 1999. "Is trust a historical residue? Information flows and trust levels," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 79-92, January.
    18. Sarah C. Rice, 2012. "Reputation and Uncertainty in Online Markets: An Experimental Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 436-452, June.
    19. repec:cup:judgdm:v:1:y:2006:i::p:76-85 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Fiona McGillivray & Alastair Smith, 2005. "The Impact of Leadership Turnover and Domestic Institutions on International Cooperation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 49(5), pages 639-660, October.
    21. Victor Vikram Odouard & Michael Holton Price, 2022. "Tit for Tattling: Cooperation, communication, and how each could stabilize the other," Papers 2201.06792, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:50:y:2006:i:3:p:339-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.