IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v27y1983i2p231-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extended Deterrence by Superpower Alliance

Author

Listed:
  • Erich Weede

    (Forschungsinstitut für Soziologie, University of Cologne)

Abstract

Research in quantitative international politics and peace science is dominated by two puzzles and their corresponding research designs. (1) Why do some nations fight wars more often than others? (2) Which system characteristics contribute to war? What is often neglected is a third puzzle: Why do particular nations fight each other? Dyadic analyses are most useful for dealing with this problem, and can be used to test the preferred policy of national security elites on matters such as deterrence. An empirical investigation is carried out to discover whether extended nuclear deterrence has reduced the risk of war in the 1960s and 1970s. While the evidence provides only moderate support, it still confirms the view that extended nuclear deterrence has reduced the risk of war.

Suggested Citation

  • Erich Weede, 1983. "Extended Deterrence by Superpower Alliance," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 27(2), pages 231-253, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:27:y:1983:i:2:p:231-253
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002783027002002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002783027002002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002783027002002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Intriligator & Dagobert Brito, 1981. "Nuclear proliferation and the probability of nuclear war," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 247-260, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael P. Leidy & Robert W. Staiger, 1985. "Economic Issues and Methodology in Arms Race Analysis," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(3), pages 503-530, September.
    2. Michael Ben-Gad & Yakov Ben-Haim & Dan Peled, 2020. "Allocating Security Expenditures under Knightian Uncertainty: An Info-Gap Approach," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 830-850, October.
    3. Murray Wolfson, 1987. "A theorem on the existence of zones of initiation and deterrence in Intriligator-Brito arms race models," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 291-297, August.
    4. Bruce Bueno de Mesquita & William H. Riker, 1982. "An Assessment of the Merits of Selective Nuclear Proliferation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(2), pages 283-306, June.
    5. Intriligator Michael D, 2011. "Peace Science and Peace Economics Can Help Win the Fight against Nuclear Proliferation," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Dagobert L. Brito & Michael D. Intriligator, 1996. "Proliferation and the Probability of War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(1), pages 206-214, March.
    7. Bruce D. Berkowitz, 1985. "Proliferation, Deterrence, and the Likelihood of Nuclear War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(1), pages 112-136, March.
    8. Mark Reitman, 1987. "Toward the Global Optimization Model of Peace Defense," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 31(3), pages 525-542, September.
    9. Kyle Beardsley & Victor Asal, 2009. "Winning with the Bomb," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 53(2), pages 278-301, April.
    10. Frank C. Zagare, 2004. "Reconciling Rationality with Deterrence," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 16(2), pages 107-141, April.
    11. Michael D. Intriligator, 1982. "Research on Conflict Theory," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(2), pages 307-327, June.
    12. Robert Rauchhaus, 2009. "Evaluating the Nuclear Peace Hypothesis," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 53(2), pages 258-277, April.
    13. Daniel S. Geller, 1990. "Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Crisis Escalation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(2), pages 291-310, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:27:y:1983:i:2:p:231-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.