IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v25y1981i3p495-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Siding and Other Reactions to a Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Evert Van De Vliert

    (Department of Social Psychology Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Siding in a dyadic conflict is important because it precipitates escalation. Nevertheless, little is known about how and why a nonprofessional outsider (P) reacts when a conflict party puts him under pressure to take sides. Coalition and role conflict theories suggest four behavior alternatives (taking sides, compromise, avoidance, and conflict resolution) and two behavior determinants: the sanction power and the legitimate power each of the conflict parties exerts over P. This article delineates the relationships among these variables (power hypothesis), and introduces the further assumptions that P will gather information before he selects one of the four behavior alternatives (process hypothesis) and that escalating siding behavior will be his most frequent reaction (escalation hypothesis). In a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data on behavior in role conflict situations, the power hypothesis and the escalation hypothesis are confirmed. Finally, the theoretical and practical significance of the theory are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Evert Van De Vliert, 1981. "Siding and Other Reactions to a Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 25(3), pages 495-520, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:25:y:1981:i:3:p:495-520
    DOI: 10.1177/002200278102500305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200278102500305
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200278102500305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:25:y:1981:i:3:p:495-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.