IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v20y1976i3p413-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Differences in Bargaining Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Druckman

    (Mathematica, Inc., Bethesda, Md.)

  • Alan A. Benton

    (Psychology Department University of Illinois, Chicago Circle)

  • Faizunisa Ali

    (Institute for Juvenile Research, Chicago)

  • J. Susana Bagur

    (Institute for Juvenile Research, Chicago)

Abstract

The bargaining behavior of children and adolescents from three cultures on a competitive resource distribution task was examined. Subjects played a game in which they alternated suggestions until they agreed on a distribution. The strongest effects were those obtained for culture. Indian bargainers negotiated longer, were more competitive, were more symmetrical in their competitiveness, and had larger discrepancies in their settlements than did either the Argentineans or the Americans. Americans were most compromising in their trial-by-trial offers and in their final outcome, suggesting a convergent bargaining style. Additional data suggest that the bargaining differences may reflect differences among the cultures in their general orientations, with Indians emphasizing both competitiveness and need derived from a “view of the world†that is based on scarcity or limited resources. Other findings indicate that the effects of age, sex, and experimental condition vary among cultures. An age effect was obtained only in India, where older bargainers negotiated longer and rejected a higher proportion of their opponent's offers than did younger bargainers. Male bargainers were more competitive than females in India and the United States, but a trend in the opposite direction was obtained for Argentinean bargainers. And a different pattern of condition effects for length of negotiations was obtained for the three cultures.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Druckman & Alan A. Benton & Faizunisa Ali & J. Susana Bagur, 1976. "Cultural Differences in Bargaining Behavior," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 20(3), pages 413-452, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:20:y:1976:i:3:p:413-452
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277602000303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277602000303
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277602000303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guttman, Joel M., 2001. "Self-enforcing reciprocity norms and intergenerational transfers: theory and evidence," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 117-151, July.
    2. Gregory Kersten & Sunil Noronha, 1999. "Negotiation via the World Wide Web: A Cross-cultural Study of Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 251-279, May.
    3. Guy Oliver Faure, 1999. "The Cultural Dimensions of Negotiation: The Chinese Case," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 187-215, May.
    4. Morris, Michael W. & Fu, Ho-Ying, 2000. "How Does Culture Influence Conflict Resolution? A Dynamic Constructive Analysis," Research Papers 1649, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:20:y:1976:i:3:p:413-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.