IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jjlobr/v13y2024i2p198-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limning Auditing Indian Auditors

Author

Listed:
  • Rajat Deb

Abstract

The boom of regulatory agencies is a common global phenomenon, and its basics are deeply rooted in national settings, leading to the setting up of specific regulators. Theoretically, auditors must demonstrate their professional prowess, skepticism, and analytical procedure, and effectively communicate audit outcomes to the stakeholders. Interestingly, the Indian audit profession is at its crossroads: constrained by scams and multiple regulators. Reform initiatives in the wake of corporate shenanigans compelled the creation of the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) under Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013. However, the accounting profession regulator, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), alleges penetration of the former in its regulatory jurisdiction. Against this backdrop, adopting a descriptive approach, the current study attempts to unearth the factors leading to such face-offs for offering an amicable solution. The study concludes that the ICAI’s objections to treating the NFRA as a “super-regulator†cannot be supported. Consequently, the observation of the Committee on Experts constituted by the Supreme Court. Vesting investigating power in the NFRA could be a game changer in regulating auditors, audit firms, and audit networks. In light of the findings, the auditors could motivate to improve the audit quality substantially.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajat Deb, 2024. "Limning Auditing Indian Auditors," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 13(2), pages 198-212, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jjlobr:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:198-212
    DOI: 10.1177/22786821231201439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22786821231201439
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22786821231201439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniella Juric & Brendan O’Connell & Michaela Rankin & Jacqueline Birt, 2018. "Determinants of the Severity of Legal and Employment Consequences for CPAs Named in SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 545-563, February.
    2. Pierre Astolfi, 2021. "Did the International Financial Reporting Standards Increase the Audit Expectation Gap? An Exploratory Study," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 166-195, May.
    3. Rajib Doogar & Stephen P. Rowe & Padmakumar Sivadasan, 2015. "Asleep at the Wheel (Again)? Bank Audits During the Lead†Up to the Financial Crisis," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 358-391, March.
    4. Cumming, Douglas & Peter Groh, Alexander & Johan, Sofia, 2018. "Same rules, different enforcement: Market abuse in Europe," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 130-151.
    5. Mohamed Abdel Aziz Hegazy & Rasha El-Haddad & Noha Mahmoud Kamareldawla, 2022. "Impact of auditor characteristics and Covid-19 Pandemic on KAMs reporting," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(7), pages 908-933, August.
    6. Lennox, Clive & Li, Bing, 2014. "Accounting misstatements following lawsuits against auditors," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 58-75.
    7. repec:eme:maj000:maj-07-2021-3271 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Lauren C. Reid & Joseph V. Carcello & Chan Li & Terry L. Neal & Jere R. Francis, 2019. "Impact of Auditor Report Changes on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 1501-1539, September.
    9. repec:eme:maj000:maj-07-2021-3261 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Clive Lennox & Bing Li, 2020. "When Are Audit Firms Sued for Financial Reporting Failures and What Are the Lawsuit Outcomes?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1370-1399, September.
    11. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Ruxandra-Ioana Pitorac & Andreea Claudia Crucean, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on auditors’ responsibility: evidence from European listed companies on key audit matters," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(7), pages 886-907, April.
    12. Xu, Wenming & Xu, Guangdong, 2020. "Understanding public enforcement of securities law in China: An empirical analysis of the enforcement actions of the CSRC and its regional offices against informational misconduct," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Ram Mohan, M.P. & Raj, Vishakha, 2020. "Auditors’ negligence and professional misconduct in India: a struggle for a consistent legal standard," IIMA Working Papers WP 2020-09-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    14. Fei Leng & Ehsan H. Feroz & Zhiyan Cao & Sergio V. Davalos, 2011. "The Long-Term Performance and Failure Risk of Firms Cited in the US SEC's Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(7-8), pages 813-841, September.
    15. John L. Abernathy & Michael Barnes & Chad Stefaniak, 2013. "A summary of 10 years of PCAOB research: What have we learned?✩," Journal of Accounting Literature, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 30-60, October.
    16. Sikka, Prem, 2009. "Financial crisis and the silence of the auditors," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 868-873, August.
    17. Christel Koop & Martin Lodge, 2017. "What is regulation? An interdisciplinary concept analysis," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 95-108, March.
    18. Wang, Yang & Ashton, John K. & Jaafar, Aziz, 2023. "Financial statement fraud, recidivism and punishment," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    19. Muñoz-Izquierdo, Nora & Segovia-Vargas, María Jesús & Camacho-Miñano, María-del-Mar & Pascual-Ezama, David, 2019. "Explaining the causes of business failure using audit report disclosures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 403-414.
    20. Zoe†Vonna Palmrose & Susan Scholz, 2004. "The Circumstances and Legal Consequences of Non†GAAP Reporting: Evidence from Restatements," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 139-180, March.
    21. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    22. Michael Forzeh Fossung & Lazarus Elad Fotoh & Johan Lorentzon, 2020. "Determinants of audit expectation gap: the case of Cameroon," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(4/5), pages 561-576, June.
    23. Kimberly D. Westermann & Jeffrey Cohen & Greg Trompeter, 2019. "PCAOB Inspections: Public Accounting Firms on “Trial”," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 694-731, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabashi Dharmasiri & Soon-Yeow Phang & Ashna Prasad & John Webster, 2022. "Consequences of Ethical and Audit Violations: Evidence from the PCAOB Settled Disciplinary Orders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 179-203, August.
    2. Cory Cassell & Emily Hunt & Gans Narayanamoorthy & Stephen P. Rowe, 2019. "A hidden risk of auditor industry specialization: evidence from the financial crisis," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 891-926, September.
    3. Nora Muñoz-Izquierdo & María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano & María-Jesús Segovia-Vargas & David Pascual-Ezama, 2019. "Is the External Audit Report Useful for Bankruptcy Prediction? Evidence Using Artificial Intelligence," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Hoitash, Udi & Mkrtchyan, Anahit, 2022. "Internal governance and outside directors’ connections to non-director executives," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1).
    5. Christensen, Brant & Schmardebeck, Roy & Seidel, Timothy, 2022. "Do auditors’ incentives affect materiality assessments of prior-period misstatements?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    6. Curtis Hall & J. Scott Judd & Jayanthi Sunder, 2023. "Auditor conservatism, audit quality, and real consequences for clients," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 689-725, June.
    7. van Brenk, Herman & Renes, Remko & Trompeter, Gregory M., 2022. "Auditing in the public interest: Reforming the profession by building on the strengths of the existing accounting firms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Al-Hadi, Ahmed & Taylor, Grantley & Monzur Hasan, Mostafa & Eulaiwi, Baban, 2023. "Third-party auditor liability and financial restatements," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    9. Goodson, Brian M. & Grenier, Jonathan H. & Maksymov, Eldar, 2023. "When law students think like audit litigation attorneys: Implications for experimental research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    10. Kyle D. Allen & Drew B. Winters, 2021. "Auditor response to changing risk: money market funds during the financial crisis," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1057-1086, April.
    11. Cao, June & Ee, Mong Shan & Hasan, Iftekhar & Huang, He, 2024. "Asymmetric reactions of abnormal audit fees jump to credit rating changes," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    12. Meiying Hua & Pervaiz Alam, 2021. "Audit Quality and Environment, Social, and Governance Risks," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(2), pages 50-75, April.
    13. John Goodwin & Yigit Atilgan & Serif Aziz Simsir & Kamran Ahmed, 2020. "Investor reaction to accounting misstatements under IFRS: Australian evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2467-2512, September.
    14. Sarah B. Stuber & Chris E. Hogan, 2021. "Do PCAOB Inspections Improve the Accuracy of Accounting Estimates?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 331-370, March.
    15. Chy, Mahfuz & De Franco, Gus & Su, Barbara, 2021. "The effect of auditor litigation risk on clients' access to bank debt: Evidence from a quasi-experiment," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    16. Dermarkar, Simon & Hazgui, Mouna, 2022. "How auditors legitimize commercialism: A micro-discursive analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    17. Jade Huayu Chen, 2024. "When Employees Go to Court: Employee Lawsuits and Talent Acquisition in Audit Offices," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1265-1307, September.
    18. Daniel Aobdia & Luminita Enache & Anup Srivastava, 2021. "Changes in Big N auditors’ client selection and retention strategies over time," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 715-754, February.
    19. Guangming Gong & Liang Xiao & Si Xu & Xun Gong, 2019. "Do Bond Investors Care About Engagement Auditors’ Negative Experiences? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 779-806, September.
    20. Bryan K. Church & Narisa Tianjing Dai & Xi (Jason) Kuang & Xuejiao Liu, 2020. "The Role of Auditor Narcissism in Auditor–Client Negotiations: Evidence from China," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1756-1787, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jjlobr:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:198-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.