IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v28y2003i3p231-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Power and Optimum Sample Allocation Ratio for Treatment and Control Having Unequal Costs per Unit of Randomization

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaofeng Liu

Abstract

This article considers optimal sample allocation between the treatment and control condition in multilevel designs when the costs per sampling unit vary due to treatment assignment. Optimal unequal allocation may reduce the cost from that of a balanced design without sacrificing any power. The optimum sample allocation ratio depends only on the cost ratio between the treatment and control regardless of whether the randomization of sampling units occurs at levels 1, 2, or 3. Power functions for the exact tests for the main effect of treatment are derived for prototypical multilevel designs with unequal sample sizes in the treatment and control condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaofeng Liu, 2003. "Statistical Power and Optimum Sample Allocation Ratio for Treatment and Control Having Unequal Costs per Unit of Randomization," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 28(3), pages 231-248, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:28:y:2003:i:3:p:231-248
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986028003231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986028003231
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986028003231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Md Abu Manju & Math J. J. M. Candel & Gerard J. P. van Breukelen, 2019. "SamP2CeT: an interactive computer program for sample size and power calculation for two-level cost-effectiveness trials," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 47-70, March.
    2. Kari Tokola & Andreas Lundell & Jaakko Nevalainen & Hannu Oja, 2014. "Design and cost optimization for hierarchical data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(2), pages 130-148, May.
    3. Jiin-Huarng Guo, 2012. "Optimal sample size planning for the Wilcoxon--Mann--Whitney and van Elteren tests under cost constraints," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 2153-2164, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:28:y:2003:i:3:p:231-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.