Author
Abstract
The conventional multivariate analysis of repeated measures is applicable in a wide variety of circumstances, in part, because assumptions regarding the pattern of covariances among the repeated measures are not required. If sample sizes are small, however, then the estimators of the covariance parameters lack precision and, as a result, the power of the multivariate analysis is low. If the covariance matrix associated with estimators of orthogonal contrasts is spherical, then the conventional univariate analysis of repeated measures is applicable and has greater power than the multivariate analysis. If sphericity is not satisfied, an adjusted univariate analysis can be conducted, and this adjusted analysis may still be more powerful than the multivariate analysis. As sample size increases, the power advantage of the adjusted univariate test decreases, and, for moderate sample sizes, the multivariate test can be more powerful. This article proposes a hybrid analysis that takes advantage of the strengths of each of the two procedures. The proposed analysis employs an empirical Bayes estimator of the covariance matrix. Existing software for conventional multivariate analyses can, with minor modifications, be used to perform the proposed analysis. The new analysis behaves like the univariate analysis when samples size is small or sphericity is nearly satisfied. When sample size is large or sphericity is strongly violated, then the proposed analysis behaves like the multivariate analysis. Simulation results suggest that the proposed analysis controls test size adequately and can be more powerful than either of the other two analyses under a wide range of non-null conditions.
Suggested Citation
Robert J. Boik, 1997.
"Analysis of Repeated Measures Under Second-Stage Sphericity: An Empirical Bayes Approach,"
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 22(2), pages 155-192, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:22:y:1997:i:2:p:155-192
DOI: 10.3102/10769986022002155
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:22:y:1997:i:2:p:155-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.