IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v18y1993i2p131-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thin Versus Thick Matching in the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure for Detecting DIF

Author

Listed:
  • John R. Donoghue
  • Nancy L. Allen

Abstract

This Monte Carlo study examined strategies for forming the matching variable for the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) differential item functioning (DIF) procedure; thin matching on total test score was compared to forms of thick matching, pooling levels of the matching variable. Data were generated using a three-parameter logistic (3PL) item response theory (IRT) model with common guessing parameter. Number of subjects and test length were manipulated, as were the difficulty, discrimination, and presence/absence of DIF in the studied item. Outcome measures were the transformed log-odds &Deltacirc; MH , its standard error, and the MH chi-square statistic. For short tests (5 or 10 items), thin matching yielded very poor results, with a tendency to falsely identify items as possessing DIF against the reference group. The best methods of thick matching yielded outcome measure values closer to the expected value for non-DIF items, as well as a larger value than thin matching when the studied item possessed DIF. Intermediate length tests yielded similar results for thin matching and the best methods of thick matching. The method of thick matching that performed best depended on the measure used to detect DIF. Both difficulty and discrimination of the studied item were found to have a strong effect on the value of &Deltacirc; MH .

Suggested Citation

  • John R. Donoghue & Nancy L. Allen, 1993. "Thin Versus Thick Matching in the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure for Detecting DIF," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 18(2), pages 131-154, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:18:y:1993:i:2:p:131-154
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986018002131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986018002131
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986018002131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:18:y:1993:i:2:p:131-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.