IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v11y1986i3p171-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Efficiencies of Longitudinal, Mixed Longitudinal, and Cross-Sectional Designs

Author

Listed:
  • Martijn P. F. Berger

Abstract

The choice among a longitudinal, mixed longitudinal, or cross-sectional design is often called for in educational and psychological research. The problem of choosing the most efficient design to estimate polynomial parameters for time-structured data is considered, and the comparison of the efficiencies shows that the assumed degree of the polynomial is crucial for the selection of the most efficient design. When the degree is much smaller than the number of time points and the correlations between adjacent time points are not too large, cross-sectional and mixed longitudinal designs are more efficient than a longitudinal design.

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn P. F. Berger, 1986. "A Comparison of Efficiencies of Longitudinal, Mixed Longitudinal, and Cross-Sectional Designs," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 11(3), pages 171-181, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:11:y:1986:i:3:p:171-181
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986011003171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986011003171
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986011003171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:11:y:1986:i:3:p:171-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.