IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v7y2011i1p928958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Probabilistic Chain Graphical Model-Based and Gaussian Process-Based Observation Selections for Wireless Sensor Scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Qi
  • Yi Shang

Abstract

The constrained power source given by batteries has become one of the biggest hurdles for wireless sensor networks to prevail. A common technique to reduce energy consumption is to put sensors to sleep between duties. It leads to a tradeoff between making a fewer number of observations for saving energy while obtaining sufficient and more valuable sensing information. In this paper, we employ two model-based approaches for tackling the sensor scheduling problem. The first approach is to apply our corrected VoIDP algorithm on a chain graphical model for selecting a subset of observations that minimizes the overall uncertainty. The second approach is to find a selection of observations based on Gaussian process model that maximizes the entropy and the mutual information criteria, respectively. We compare their performances in terms of predictive accuracies for the unobserved time points based on their selections of observations. Experimental results show that the Gaussian process model-based method achieves higher predictive accuracy if sensor data are accurate. However, when observations have errors, its performance degrades quickly. In contrast, the graphical model-based approach is more robust and error tolerant.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Qi & Yi Shang, 2011. "Comparison of Probabilistic Chain Graphical Model-Based and Gaussian Process-Based Observation Selections for Wireless Sensor Scheduling," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 7(1), pages 928958-9289, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:928958
    DOI: 10.1155/2011/928958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1155/2011/928958
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2011/928958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:928958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.