IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v14y2018i10p1550147718804687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic responses of concrete-faced rockfill dam due to different seismic motion input methods

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Xu
  • Yang Zhou
  • Chenguang Zhou
  • Xianjing Kong
  • Degao Zou

Abstract

The concrete-faced rockfill dam valley foundation was considered as an open energy system and a reasonable non-uniform seismic motion input method was applied to the dynamic analysis of a concrete-faced rockfill dam based on the generalized plastic model. First, the corresponding program was validated by means of the scattering question of an idealized semicircle valley. Subsequently, the seismic elasto-plastic finite element analyses were performed to compare and investigate the performances of a concrete-faced rockfill dam under different seismic motion input methods. The results show that the dynamic responses of the concrete-faced rockfill dam are decreased by 10%–30% approximately with the use of non-uniform seismic motion input method. As a result, the traditional uniform seismic motion input method would overestimate the responses of the dam. From the perspective of seismic safety evaluation, the overestimations would disturb the reasonable assessment of the aseismic capacity of the dam. Moreover, the slope stability analysis results might be conservative and unreasonable due to overestimating the accelerations during the earthquake.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Xu & Yang Zhou & Chenguang Zhou & Xianjing Kong & Degao Zou, 2018. "Dynamic responses of concrete-faced rockfill dam due to different seismic motion input methods," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 14(10), pages 15501477188, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:14:y:2018:i:10:p:1550147718804687
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147718804687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147718804687
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147718804687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:14:y:2018:i:10:p:1550147718804687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.