IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v13y2017i9p1550147717731247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quality-of-service evaluation method based on the cloud model for routing protocols in wireless sensor network

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxian Jiang
  • Chenzhe Gu
  • Jingjing Wu

Abstract

The routing layer quality of service in wireless sensor network depends on different indices such as throughput, delay, packet loss rate, energy consumption, and degree of congestion. A single index does not adequately reflect the real quality of service while an excessive number of indices increase the complexity of the evaluation model. In addition, existing quantitative evaluation methods can lead to under-fitting or over-fitting. In this article, we present a comprehensive qualitative quality-of-service evaluation method based on the cloud model. Using Gaussian cloud transformation, each quality-of-service index can be divided into several qualitative concepts (cloud models). Concepts belonging to different indices can be combined together to evaluate the quality of service. We use a frequent-pattern tree approach to mine association rules of quality-of-service concepts and arrive at a suitable decision. This method simplifies the evaluation model by transforming a numeric value to its equivalent qualitative concept and brings out the internal relationships among different quality-of-service indices according to the association rules. Besides, it automatically finds a common standard to evaluate and compare different routing protocols simultaneously. The evaluation results show that the proposed method provides a good quality-of-service assessment when applied to different routing protocols.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxian Jiang & Chenzhe Gu & Jingjing Wu, 2017. "A quality-of-service evaluation method based on the cloud model for routing protocols in wireless sensor network," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 13(9), pages 15501477177, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:13:y:2017:i:9:p:1550147717731247
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147717731247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147717731247
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147717731247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:13:y:2017:i:9:p:1550147717731247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.