IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v12y2016i2p5052614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method for Trust Quantification in Cloud Computing Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohui Li
  • Jingsha He
  • Bin Zhao
  • Jing Fang
  • Yixuan Zhang
  • Hongxing Liang

Abstract

Cloud computing and Internet of Things (IoT) are emerging technologies that have experienced rapid development in recent years. While cloud computing presents a new platform over which services are offered to the user more conveniently, IoT facilitates the collection of a large amount of data via interconnected wireless sensors for event monitoring and control. In such environments, ownership and control over the data may lead to potential conflict between the protection of data and the provision of services. Thus, cloud security has received a great deal of attention in recent years. In this paper, we propose a method for trust quantification based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation theory for cloud computing to protect user data through trust quantification of cloud services after we introduce trust ontology for cloud services and define user preference trust values. By enhancing the existing trust concept based on dynamic requirements, we introduce some cloud service attributes to study layered service representation for trust preference and then apply the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation theory to perform trust quantification. We also perform some experiment to show that the proposed method is effective and can dynamically perform trust quantification to deal with malicious acts of nonfaithful services.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohui Li & Jingsha He & Bin Zhao & Jing Fang & Yixuan Zhang & Hongxing Liang, 2016. "A Method for Trust Quantification in Cloud Computing Environments," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 12(2), pages 5052614-505, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:12:y:2016:i:2:p:5052614
    DOI: 10.1155/2016/5052614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1155/2016/5052614
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2016/5052614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:12:y:2016:i:2:p:5052614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.