IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v11y2015i10p341579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hierarchical Reputation Evidence Decision System in VANETs

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Yang
  • Zhipeng Gao
  • Xuesong Qiu
  • Qian Liu
  • Yuwen Hao
  • Jingchen Zheng

Abstract

In VANETs, users are rational, independent, and selfish. Stimulation-based reputation management system is critical for them to avoid selfishness and promote network performance in large-scale VANETs. The current reputation mechanisms produce some problems, for example, overfull energy consumptions, confused collusion, and misreport. In order to detect selfish and collusive behaviors accurately and quickly, we propose a dynamic three-layer reputation evidence decision and management mechanism, which combine with Dempster-Shafer evidence integration mechanism to distinguish selfish nodes. In particular, the system helps in collusion avoidance through reporting falsified reputation evidences of colluders. In addition, we borrow ideas from Weber-Fechner's law and design an adaptive reputation evidence gathering cycle for prolonging the lifetime of detector and overwhelming frequent polling for reputation evidences. The simulation results demonstrate that REDS has higher detection speed for selfish nodes and collusive observers and less network traffic of gathering reputations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Yang & Zhipeng Gao & Xuesong Qiu & Qian Liu & Yuwen Hao & Jingchen Zheng, 2015. "A Hierarchical Reputation Evidence Decision System in VANETs," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 11(10), pages 341579-3415, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:11:y:2015:i:10:p:341579
    DOI: 10.1155/2015/341579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1155/2015/341579
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2015/341579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:11:y:2015:i:10:p:341579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.