IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v25y2022i3p195-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electoral competition and government health expenditure in electoral autocracies: A pessimistic view

Author

Listed:
  • Jeong-Woo Lee

Abstract

Does electoral competition affect expenditures on the provision of public goods in electoral autocracies? Previous studies firmly agree that multiparty elections are critical to autocratic survival. Accordingly, studies argue that multiparty elections lead to an increase in health expenditure in electoral autocracies. In addition to the literature, less explored is the effect of electoral competition on the expenditure. If oppositions can run elections with a higher level of electoral competition and threaten the dictator's winning over elections, would autocrats provide more public goods to citizens? This paper raises a pessimistic view on this question and argues that the impact of electoral competition does not affect government health expenditure. Empirical findings with 291 cases of 70 electoral autocracies from 2000 to 2018 and an illustrative case study of Armenia demonstrate that autocrats are less likely to provide health and education expenditures to citizens even though they face higher competition during elections.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeong-Woo Lee, 2022. "Electoral competition and government health expenditure in electoral autocracies: A pessimistic view," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 25(3), pages 195-213, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:25:y:2022:i:3:p:195-213
    DOI: 10.1177/22338659221112997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22338659221112997
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22338659221112997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:25:y:2022:i:3:p:195-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.