IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v12y2009i3p199-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical and Strategic Frameworks for National Evaluation Capacity Building (NECB)

Author

Listed:
  • Sim Kwang-ho

Abstract

Focusing on the concept and logic of evaluation capacity building in both organizational and national level, firstly, this paper attempts to derive a theoretical, conceptual framework for national evaluation capacity building (NECB) that could be tailored to the Korean setting. The past Korean governments, as well as other leading countries, have undergone great economic, political hardships since 1990s without their own effective NECB efforts. Accordingly, this study also suggests that a strategic framework for NECB can be effectively developed by integrating major elements or factors, which are derived from the theoretical framework for NECB, such as: establishing a national evaluation management system, creating legal foundation and budgets specific to evaluation, constructing both institutional and electronic evaluation networks, and finally developing and retaining professional national evaluation resources. In this context, this paper implies that a nation like Korea would be globally competitive by systematically building and enhancing its national evaluation capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Sim Kwang-ho, 2009. "Theoretical and Strategic Frameworks for National Evaluation Capacity Building (NECB)," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 12(3), pages 199-218, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:199-218
    DOI: 10.1177/223386590901200312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/223386590901200312
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/223386590901200312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:199-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.