IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v12y2009i1p81-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiated Modes of Interest Representation and the Politics of Transitional Regimes in Turkey and Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Ji-Hyang Jang

Abstract

It has been claimed that Turkey and Egypt possess a similar pattern of interest representation in which the earlier state-corporatism has been giving way to a more variegated form of corporatism. However, the seemingly similar structure of post state-corporatist system in both countries displays explicit differences given the distinguished and disaggregated stages of their transitional regime types. Namely, the representational dualism in which preexisting corporatism coexists with resurgent pluralism in post-Kemalist Turkey and post-Nasserist Egypt, does not share much similarity. Although both Turkey and Egypt have not reached the stage of liberal democracy or consolidated democracy, the former is classified as ambiguous regime moving toward electoral democracy while the latter is distinctively categorized as electoral authoritarian regime, typical pseudo democracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji-Hyang Jang, 2009. "Differentiated Modes of Interest Representation and the Politics of Transitional Regimes in Turkey and Egypt," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 81-99, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:12:y:2009:i:1:p:81-99
    DOI: 10.1177/223386590901200106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/223386590901200106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/223386590901200106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:12:y:2009:i:1:p:81-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.