IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v10y2007i1p175-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Europeanism and Atlantism in the Italian Foreign Policy: Focused on Continuity and Change

Author

Listed:
  • Sonphil Lee

Abstract

This paper will try to examine the significance, role and co-relations of Europeanism and Atlantism that has been two axes of the Italian foreign policy from the end of the 2nd World War to the present. Through the research, this paper will make clear that Europeanism and Atlantism were in complimentary relations and were good instruments to achieve national interest, a substantial goal of Italian foreign policy. Europeanism and Atlantism have been preserved with continuity in Italian foreign policy. Even after the Cold war, they merely had changes in the style of conducting the center-right and center-left governments. As for the co-relations between Europeanism and Atlantism, the two orientations have been supplementary in pursuing national interests of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonphil Lee, 2007. "Europeanism and Atlantism in the Italian Foreign Policy: Focused on Continuity and Change," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 10(1), pages 175-191, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:175-191
    DOI: 10.1177/223386590701000110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/223386590701000110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/223386590701000110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fredrik Doeser & Joakim Eidenfalk, 2013. "The importance of windows of opportunity for foreign policy change," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 16(4), pages 390-406, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:175-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.