IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v28y2005i3p271-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuity amidst Restructuring: The U.S. Gender Division of Labor in Geographic Perspective, 1970 and 1990

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence A. Brown

    (Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OHlabrown@geography.ohio-state.edu)

  • Sang-Il Lee

    (Seoul National University, Koreasi_lee@snu.ac.kr)

  • Linda Lobao

    (Department of Human and Community Resource Development, Program in Rural Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OHlobao.1@osu.edu)

  • Su-Yeul Chung

    (Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OHchung.197@osu.edu)

Abstract

Research on economic restructuring generally emphasizes change, rather than continuity, in the socioeconomic landscape. That expectation is addressed here by comparing 1970 and 1990 in terms of the gender division of labor for U.S. counties. These years represent poles of the Fordist/post-Fordist transition, an era of cataclysmic change. A subset of counties comprising the Ohio River Valley also is considered. This represents an old industrial region, the type most affected by the Fordist/post-Fordist transition. Analyses include cartographic comparisons using various spatial analysis techniques and regression analyses using variables related to the gender division of labor. Contrary to the usual expectation, the authors find that the lack of change is far more dominant than its presence, that is, continuity or continuity amidst change. This highlights the important, and generally overlooked, role of inertia effects on socioeconomic landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence A. Brown & Sang-Il Lee & Linda Lobao & Su-Yeul Chung, 2005. "Continuity amidst Restructuring: The U.S. Gender Division of Labor in Geographic Perspective, 1970 and 1990," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 271-301, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:28:y:2005:i:3:p:271-301
    DOI: 10.1177/0160017604268789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0160017604268789
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0160017604268789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luc Anselin, 2000. "Computing environments for spatial data analysis," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 201-220, September.
    2. Moshe Semyonov & Richard Scott, 1983. "Industrial shifts, female employment, and occupational differentiation: a dynamic model for American cities, 1960–1970," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 20(2), pages 163-176, May.
    3. Lawrence A. Brown, 2000. "The GIS/SA interface for substantive research(ers): A critical need," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 43-47, March.
    4. Ann Markusen, 1996. "Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(3), pages 293-313, July.
    5. Michael Tiefelsdorf, 1998. "Some Practical Applications Of Moran'S I'S Exact Conditional Distribution," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 101-129, April.
    6. Efthymios Tsionas, 2000. "Regional Growth and Convergence: Evidence from the United States," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 231-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianfranco DI VAIO & Michele BATTISTI, 2010. "A Spatially-Filtered Mixture of Beta-Convergence Regression for EU Regions, 1980-2002," Regional and Urban Modeling 284100013, EcoMod.
    2. Marta Gancarczyk, 2010. "Model schyłku i odrodzenia klastrów," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 1-21.
    3. Michael Beenstock & Daniel Felsenstein, 2003. "Decomposing the Dynamics of Regional Earnings Disparities in Israel," ERSA conference papers ersa03p90, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Kean Birch & Andrew Cumbers, 2010. "Knowledge, Space, and Economic Governance: The Implications of Knowledge-Based Commodity Chains for Less-Favoured Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(11), pages 2581-2601, November.
    5. Roberta Rabellotti & Alessia Amighini, 2003. "The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector," ERSA conference papers ersa03p500, European Regional Science Association.
    6. V. I. Blanutsa, 2022. "Geographic Research of the Platform Economy: Existing and Potential Approaches," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, June.
    7. Dukhabandhu Sahoo & Diptimayee Mishra & Auro Kumar Sahoo & Phendulwa Zikhona Makunga & Jayanti Behera, 2020. "Regional and subregional analyses of macroeconomic policy strategies for growth and equality in Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-176, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Tamas Dusek, 2006. "Regional Income Differences in Hungary - A Multi-Level Spatio-Temporal Analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa06p284, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Tobias D. Ketterer, 2012. "Do Local Amenities Affect The Appeal Of Regions In Europe For Migrants?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 535-561, October.
    10. Mercedes Delgado & Michael E. Porter & Scott Stern, 2016. "Defining clusters of related industries," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-38.
    11. Sacchetti, Silvia & Tortia, Ermanno, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    12. Bieri, David, 2006. "Picking a Winner? Evidence from the Non-Manufacturing High-Tech Industry in the Blacksburg MSA," MPRA Paper 1079, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Dec 2006.
    13. John Britton, 2002. "Regional Implications of North American Integration: A Canadian Perspective on High Technology Manufacturing," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 359-374.
    14. Antonio Páez, 2021. "Open spatial sciences: an introduction," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 467-476, October.
    15. Ian R. Gordon & Philip McCann, 2000. "Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 513-532, March.
    16. Shiri Breznitz & Douglas Noonan, 2014. "Arts districts, universities, and the rise of digital media," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 594-615, August.
    17. Sebastian Henn & Eric Laureys, 2010. "Bridging Ruptures: The Re-emergence of the Antwerp Diamond District After World War II and the Role of Strategic Action," Chapters, in: Dirk Fornahl & Sebastian Henn & Max-Peter Menzel (ed.), Emerging Clusters, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Cassandra C Wang & George C S Lin & Guicai Li, 2010. "Industrial Clustering and Technological Innovation in China: New Evidence from the ICT Industry in Shenzhen," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(8), pages 1987-2010, August.
    19. Francesco Schiavone, 2004. "Divison Of Labour, Social Networks And Intangible Resources: The Italian Case Of Network Business Creation," Industrial Organization 0405005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Gregor Murray & Patrice Jalette & Jacques Bélanger & Christian Lévesque, 2014. "The ‘hollowing out’ of the national subsidiary in multinational companies: is it happening, does it matter, what are the strategic consequences?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(2), pages 217-236, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:28:y:2005:i:3:p:271-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.