IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v25y2002i1p38-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Specialized Markets and the Behavior of Firms: Evidence from the United Kingdom’s Regional Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Suma S. Athreye

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, s.s.athreye@open.ac.uk)

  • David Keeble

    (Centre for Business Research and Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, dek1@cus.cam.ac.uk)

Abstract

A key feature of the South East regional economy in recent decades has been the development of several intermediate markets in specialized business services. This article investigates whether the greater development of specialized markets in the South East is associated with different competitive and technological behaviors of innovative firms in this region when compared with firms in the Industrial Heartland regions of the West Midlands, North West England, and York-shire and Humberside. We find greater buying and selling of technology by firms and the presence of technological externalities in the South East, even when the services-intensive nature of the region’s production is accounted for. Industrial Heartland firms, in contrast, more frequently collaborate with domestic suppliers who are also an important source of technology. They also have greater collaboration with higher education institutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Suma S. Athreye & David Keeble, 2002. "Specialized Markets and the Behavior of Firms: Evidence from the United Kingdom’s Regional Economies," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 25(1), pages 38-62, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:25:y:2002:i:1:p:38-62
    DOI: 10.1177/016001702762039376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001702762039376
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/016001702762039376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Hughes & Eric Wood, 1999. "Rerthinking Innovation Comparisons between Manufacturing and Services: The Experience of the CBR SME Surveys in the UK," Working Papers wp140, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    2. Young, Allyn A., 1928. "Increasing Returns and Economic Progress," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 38, pages 527-542.
    3. George J. Stigler, 1951. "The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(3), pages 185-185.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuliang Zhang & Xiaohui Hu & Wei Xu, 2020. "Spatio‐temporal dynamics of technical efficiency in China’s specialized markets: A stochastic frontier analysis approach," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1182-1202, September.
    2. Shouhong Xie & Hanbing Li, 2022. "Research on the Spatial Agglomeration of Commodity Trading Markets and Its Influencing Factors in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2006. "Better Rules or Stronger Communities? On the Social Foundations of Institutional Change and Its Economic Effects," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Yang, X. & Liu, P.W., 1999. "Division of Labor Transaction Cost, Emergence of the Firm and Firm Size," Papers 10, Chicago - Graduate School of Business.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4cufqrm9749dbol0m0bsfeopka is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Balakrishnan, Pulapre & Das, Mausumi & Parameswaran, M., 2017. "The internal dynamic of Indian economic growth," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 46-61.
    5. Murata, Yasusada, 2007. "Taste heterogeneity and the scale of production: Fragmentation, unification, and segmentation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 135-160, July.
    6. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/4cufqrm9749dbol0m0bsfeopka is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Ivan Dufeu, 2004. "Market Size and Vertical Equilibrium in the Context of Successive Cournot Oligopolies," Working Papers hal-00581571, HAL.
    8. Haiwen Zhou, 2021. "Fixed Costs and the Division of Labor," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 22(1), pages 63-81, May.
    9. Peres Núñez, Wilson, 2006. "The slow comeback of industrial policies in Latin America and the Caribbean," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    10. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/213eirv3qr8fqpl5i66e1hrfr1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Harry Bloch & Stan Metcalfe, 2011. "Complexity in the Theory of the Developing Firm," Chapters, in: Cristiano Antonelli (ed.), Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Volker Mahnke, 2001. "The Process of Vertical Dis-Integration: An Evolutionary Perspective on Outsourcing," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 5(3), pages 353-379, September.
    13. Ciccone, Antonio & Matsuyama, Kiminori, 1996. "Start-up costs and pecuniary externalities as barriers to economic development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 33-59, April.
    14. Lacoude Philippe, 1995. "Une Critique des Theories de la Croissance Endogene," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 6(4), pages 581-620, December.
    15. Zhang, Yongsheng & Zhao, Xueyan, 2004. "Testing the scale effect predicted by the Fujita-Krugman urbanization model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 207-222, October.
    16. Jeffrey Sachs & Xiaokai Yang & Dingsheng Zhang, 2005. "Pattern Of Trade And Economic Development In A Model Of Monopolistic Competition," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: An Inframarginal Approach To Trade Theory, chapter 10, pages 185-221, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    17. Hongmei Lei & Ying Chen & Ruiqi Li & Deli He & Jiang Zhang, 2015. "Maximum Entropy for the International Division of Labor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/f0uohitsgqh8dhk980ea412b5 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Robert P. Gilles & Emiliya Lazarova & Pieter H. M. Ruys, 2006. "On Socio-Economic Roles And Specialisation," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 25(2), pages 157-170, June.
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/f0uohitsgqh8dhk980ea412b5 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Robert P. Gilles & Emiliya A. Lazarova & Pieter H. M. Ruys, 2007. "Stability, Specialization And Social Recognition," Division of Labor & Transaction Costs (DLTC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(02), pages 83-109.
    22. Knaap, T., 1998. "A survey of complementaries in growth and location theories," Research Report 98C44, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    23. Satya Prasad Padhi, 2018. "Importance of Employment Growth: A Perspective on Technological Progress," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 61(2), pages 401-409, June.
    24. Titan Alon, 2018. "Earning More by Doing Less: Human Capital Specialization and the College Wage Premium," 2018 Meeting Papers 497, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    25. Yushan Hu & Ben G. Li, 2021. "The production economics of economics production," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 228-255, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:25:y:2002:i:1:p:38-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.