IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v15y1992i3p317-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons from the Debate on Location Analysis in Rural Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard Rushton

    (Department of Geography, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1316 USA)

Abstract

Several lessons have been learned from the debate on appropriate methods for locating urban functions in developing rural areas. While location-allocation models are superior for well-defined service location selection problems where suitable data and modeling skills are available, the urban functions in rural development methodology is superior where objectives are poorly specified, data sparse, and modeling skills poor. A wide variety of issues occur in rural development planning, but current theory and methods in regional science are poorly developed to deal with them. The area needs considerably more research.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard Rushton, 1992. "Lessons from the Debate on Location Analysis in Rural Economic Development," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 317-324, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:15:y:1992:i:3:p:317-324
    DOI: 10.1177/016001769301500311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001769301500311
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/016001769301500311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James R. Prescott & David A. Vandenbroucke, 1992. "Some Comments on Central Place Structure and Rural Planning," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 15(1), pages 51-57, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuhlman, Tom, 2000. "Goodbye to planning? : reflections on the case for regional planning in poor countries in a neo-institutional framework," Serie Research Memoranda 0011, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Piet Rietveld, 1992. "Methods for Planning Urban Facilities in Rural Areas of Developing Countries: A Comparison of Approaches," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 345-356, December.
    3. Eric S. Belsky & Gerald J. Karaska, 1992. "Toward Effective Regional and Location Planning for Rural and Urban Linkages: The Debate Joined," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 341-343, December.
    4. Dennis A. Rondinelli, 1992. "Location Analysis and Regional Development: Summing Up and Moving on," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 325-340, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:15:y:1992:i:3:p:317-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.