IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indqtr/v80y2024i4p481-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested Grounds and Missing Sticks: Assessing the Legality of India’s Surgical Strikes in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Nabarun Roy

    (Nabarun Roy is an assistant professor in the Department of International Relations at the South Asian University, New Delhi. He obtained his PhD from the Department of Political Science, Carleton University, Ottawa. His research focuses on theories of international relations, wars, great power politics, geopolitics of South Asia and Indian foreign policy.)

Abstract

The article wades into the contested issue of the legality of India’s surgical strikes in Pakistan in the last decade. While legal scholars have deliberated on the legality of India’s actions, international relations (IR) have remained silent, thereby underlining the chasm between IR and international law when it comes to international issues. This article evaluates the competing claims made by legal scholars by engaging with developments in international law pertaining to the use of force as an ‘outsider’ approaching the issue from a fresh vantage point. It finds the argument regarding the weakness of India’s legal position to be more convincing. However,it does not fully subscribe to the reasons attributed for the weakness. Drawing on insights from IR, it highlights the salience of political considerations and incentive structures. The article argues that a comprehensive view that includes legal and political dimensions needs to be taken to appreciate India’s stand regarding the surgical strikes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nabarun Roy, 2024. "Contested Grounds and Missing Sticks: Assessing the Legality of India’s Surgical Strikes in Pakistan," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 80(4), pages 481-502, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:80:y:2024:i:4:p:481-502
    DOI: 10.1177/09749284241285070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09749284241285070
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09749284241285070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:80:y:2024:i:4:p:481-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.