IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indqtr/v78y2022i2p280-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

India and Climate Change: Old Traditions, New Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Vyoma Jha

    (Vyoma Jha is a graduate of the doctoral programme (J.S.D.) at Stanford Law School. She holds law degrees from Stanford Law School, New York University School of Law and National Law University, Jodhpur, India. Her work has been published in journals such as Transnational Environmental Law, Journal of World Investment and Trade and Economic & Political Weekly.)

Abstract

Climate change emerged as a serious diplomatic concern for India in the early 1990s. India has since been a staunch champion of the developing world, in multilateral climate negotiations; from playing a key role in establishing the principle of common but differentiated responsibility and respective capabilities, to forging alliances with countries with shared developmental concerns. Faced with the growing impact of climate change and changing geopolitics, India’s foreign policy on climate change has undergone significant shifts during two decades of multilateral climate talks. First, India’s willingness to undertake domestic climate action as a result of its changing economic status and, second, the role of the political leadership—since Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to power in 2014—in shaping the climate discourse both in the country and abroad. India has, in recent years, shed its defensive, naysayer strategy at climate negotiations and led several multilateral initiatives for climate action. As India celebrates 75 years of its Independence, it is forging a new, confident leadership on issues of climate change. While there is continuity in India’s traditional stance on finance and technology transfer during negotiations, Indian foreign policy has begun to display a marked change in the strategic use of climate change to assert greater power on the global stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Vyoma Jha, 2022. "India and Climate Change: Old Traditions, New Strategies," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 78(2), pages 280-296, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:78:y:2022:i:2:p:280-296
    DOI: 10.1177/09749284221089553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09749284221089553
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09749284221089553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jagadish Thaker & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2014. "Shifting discourses of climate change in India," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 107-119, March.
    2. Aniruddh Mohan & Timon Wehnert, 2019. "Is India pulling its weight? India’s nationally determined contribution and future energy plans in global climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 275-282, March.
    3. Navroz K. Dubash, 2013. "The politics of climate change in India: narratives of equity and cobenefits," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(3), pages 191-201, May.
    4. Katharina Michaelowa & Axel Michaelowa, 2012. "India as an emerging power in international climate negotiations," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(5), pages 575-590, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Kuhika & Ripberger, Joseph T. & Fox, Andrew S. & Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. & Silva, Carol L., 2021. "The future of nuclear energy in India: Evidence from a nationwide survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Joyeeta Gupta & Arthur Rempel & Hebe Verrest, 2020. "Access and allocation: the role of large shareholders and investors in leaving fossil fuels underground," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 303-322, June.
    3. Joyeeta Gupta & Arthur Rempel & Hebe Verrest, 0. "Access and allocation: the role of large shareholders and investors in leaving fossil fuels underground," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    4. Jan Mayrhofer & Joyeeta Gupta, 2016. "The politics of co-benefits in India’s energy sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1344-1363, November.
    5. Neha B Joseph & Navroz K Dubash, 2015. "The Institutionalisation of Climate Policy in India: Designing a Development-Focused, Co-Benefits Based Approach," Working Papers id:6993, eSocialSciences.
    6. Lema, Rasmus & Bhamidipati, Padmasai Lakshmi & Gregersen, Cecilia & Hansen, Ulrich Elmer & Kirchherr, Julian, 2021. "China’s investments in renewable energy in Africa: Creating co-benefits or just cashing-in?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Nölke Andreas, 2013. "A Political Economy Explanation for Country Variation in IFRS Adoption – A Comment on ‘The International Politics of IFRS Harmonization’ by K. Ramanna," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 69-76, January.
    8. Jagadish Thaker & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2014. "Shifting discourses of climate change in India," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 107-119, March.
    9. Robert Gampfer, 2016. "Minilateralism or the UNFCCC? The Political Feasibility of Climate Clubs," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(3), pages 62-88, August.
    10. Mrkajic, Vladimir & Vukelic, Djordje & Mihajlov, Andjelka, 2015. "Reduction of CO2 emission and non-environmental co-benefits of bicycle infrastructure provision: the case of the University of Novi Sad, Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 232-242.
    11. Never, Babette, 2013. "Toward the Green Economy: Assessing Countries' Green Power," GIGA Working Papers 226, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    12. Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & Ozturk, Ilhan & Yang, Xiaodong, 2023. "Central inspections of environmental protection and transition for low-carbon Chinese cities: Policy intervention and mechanism analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    13. Carlson, D'Arcy & Robinson, Stacy-ann & Blair, Catherine & McDonough, Marjorie, 2021. "China's climate ambition: Revisiting its First Nationally Determined Contribution and centering a just transition to clean energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Eric K Chu, 2018. "Urban climate adaptation and the reshaping of state–society relations: The politics of community knowledge and mobilisation in Indore, India," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1766-1782, June.
    15. Meckler, Sacha Rene, 2017. "Causes and Impacts of Deficient Liability for Climate Change Damage, and an Economic Conception for Climate Change Liability That Supports Appropriate Action: DRaCULA," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 288-298.
    16. Never, Babette & Betz, Joachim, 2014. "Comparing the Climate Policy Performance of Emerging Economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-15.
    17. Hermine Van Coppenolle & Mathieu Blondeel & Thijs Van de Graaf, 2023. "Reframing the climate debate: The origins and diffusion of net zero pledges," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 48-60, February.
    18. Theresa Stahlke, 2023. "Climate policy and the concept of co-benefits in India," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 25(1), pages 86-102, June.
    19. Andreas Schmidt & Mike Schäfer, 2015. "Constructions of climate justice in German, Indian and US media," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 535-549, December.
    20. Deepak Gopinath, 2016. "Why a clearer ‘green industrial policy’ matters for India: Reconciling growth, climate change and inequality," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(8), pages 830-835, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:78:y:2022:i:2:p:280-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.