IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indqtr/v75y2019i3p351-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Major Contentions on Nigeria’s Afrocentric Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Segun Oshewolo

Abstract

The quest for dominance/leadership in the region of Africa has been an enduring component of Nigeria’s foreign policy. However, the literature on Nigeria’s Africa policy is replete with ideas that favour the policy and those that make the policy indefensible. These opposing ideas—including the underlying arguments—have been carefully articulated by foreign policy authors, observers and practitioners. Although the arguments for the retention of the policy have been largely influenced by realist considerations, those holding opposing views have wondered whether sustaining the policy will be in the overall interest of Nigeria—particularly given the country’s changing/fluctuating fortunes in pursuing the policy. While this study finds the contending views intellectually stimulating, its objective is to contribute to the debate by offering a perspective which represents a compromise position between the contending ideas.   This study argues that it will be in Nigeria’s overall interest to retain the policy while allowing critical reforms that could help mitigate the misgivings surrounding the policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Segun Oshewolo, 2019. "Major Contentions on Nigeria’s Afrocentric Policy," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 75(3), pages 351-365, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:75:y:2019:i:3:p:351-365
    DOI: 10.1177/0974928419860920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0974928419860920
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0974928419860920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flemes, Daniel, 2007. "Conceptualising Regional Power in International Relations: Lessons from the South African Case," GIGA Working Papers 53, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aydin Aydin, 2016. "Changing Dynamics In The Middle East After The Arab Awakening; The Position Of Turkish Foreign Policy," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 3505993, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    2. Ulrike Lorenz, 2012. "Transformations on Whose Terms? Understanding the New EU-ACP Trade Relations from the Outside In," KFG Working Papers p0040, Free University Berlin.
    3. Flemes, Daniel, 2007. "Emerging Middle Powers' Soft Balancing Strategy: State and Perspectives of the IBSA Dialogue Forum," GIGA Working Papers 57, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    4. Shim, David, 2009. "A Shrimp amongst Whales? Assessing South Korea's Regional-power Status," GIGA Working Papers 107, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    5. Katabaro Miti & Sixta R Kilambo, 2012. "South Africa as a Gateway to Africa," Insight on Africa, , vol. 4(1), pages 59-67, January.
    6. Destradi, Sandra, 2008. "Empire, Hegemony, and Leadership: Developing a Research Framework for the Study of Regional Powers," GIGA Working Papers 79, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:75:y:2019:i:3:p:351-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.