IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v25y2024i1p117-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Acceptance Model 3 in Understanding Employee’s Cloud Computing Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Esra Cengiz Tırpan
  • Hülya BakırtaÅŸ

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the factors affecting cloud computing technology application by using technology acceptance model 3 (TAM3). The conceptual model was empirically analysed. While the experience of employees has no moderating effect on the relationship between subjective norm and perceived usefulness, the effect of perceived ease of use on perceived usefulness is moderated by experience. In other words, the higher the experience, the higher the effect of perceived ease of use on perceived usefulness. In addition, perceived ease of use, in terms of the perceived enjoyment and playfulness variables, has a mediating effect. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in cloud computing have positive effect on behavioral intention. Research on cloud computing and technology acceptance model has overlooked the mediating and moderating effect of variables in TAM3, on which very little work has been done.

Suggested Citation

  • Esra Cengiz Tırpan & Hülya BakırtaÅŸ, 2024. "Technology Acceptance Model 3 in Understanding Employee’s Cloud Computing Technology," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(1), pages 117-136, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:25:y:2024:i:1:p:117-136
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150920957173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150920957173
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150920957173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.
    2. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    3. M. Martínez-Torres & S. Toral Marín & F. García & S. Vázquez & M. Oliva & T. Torres, 2008. "A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 495-505.
    4. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    5. Mortenson, Michael J. & Vidgen, Richard, 2016. "A computational literature review of the technology acceptance model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1248-1259.
    6. Hsu, Pei-Fang & Ray, Soumya & Li-Hsieh, Yu-Yu, 2014. "Examining cloud computing adoption intention, pricing mechanism, and deployment model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 474-488.
    7. Subhankar Dhar, 2012. "From outsourcing to Cloud computing: evolution of IT services," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(8), pages 664-675, July.
    8. Federico Etro, 2011. "The Economics of Cloud Computing," The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 7-22, May.
    9. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    10. Senyo, Prince Kwame & Addae, Erasmus & Boateng, Richard, 2018. "Cloud computing research: A review of research themes, frameworks, methods and future research directions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 128-139.
    11. Mahak Sharma & Ruchita Gupta & Padmanav Acharya, 2020. "Prioritizing the Critical Factors of Cloud Computing Adoption Using Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(1), pages 142-161, February.
    12. Subhankar Dhar, 2012. "From outsourcing to Cloud computing: evolution of IT services," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(8), pages 664-675, July.
    13. Subhankar Dhar, 2012. "From outsourcing to Cloud computing: evolution of IT services," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(8), pages 664-675, July.
    14. Sultan, Nabil, 2013. "Knowledge management in the age of cloud computing and Web 2.0: Experiencing the power of disruptive innovations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 160-165.
    15. Kenji Kushida & Jonathan Murray & John Zysman, 2011. "Diffusing the Cloud: Cloud Computing and Implications for Public Policy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 209-237, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuraida, Shadi & Titah, Ryad, 2023. "An examination of cloud computing adoption decisions: Rational choice or cognitive bias?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Yajiong Xue & Huigang Liang & Liansheng Wu, 2011. "Punishment, Justice, and Compliance in Mandatory IT Settings," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 400-414, June.
    3. Soud M. Almahamid & Amjad F. Tweiqat & Mousa S. Almanaseer, 2016. "University website quality characteristics and success: lecturers' perspective," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(1), pages 41-61.
    4. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    5. repec:zna:indecs:v:19:y:2021:i:4:p:420-436 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Kawsar Ahmad & Arifuzzaman Arifuzzaman & Abdullah Al Mamun & Junayed Md Khaled Bin Oalid, 2021. "Impact of consumer’s security, benefits and usefulness towards cashless transaction within Malaysian university student," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 238-250, March.
    8. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    9. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    10. Oghuma, Apollos Patricks & Chang, Younghoon & Libaque-Saenz, Christian Fernando & Park, Myeong-Cheol & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2015. "Benefit-confirmation model for post-adoption behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: A comparative analysis of KakaoTalk and Joyn in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 658-677.
    11. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    12. Netsanet Haile & Jörn Altmann, 2016. "Structural analysis of value creation in software service platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 129-142, May.
    13. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & Al-Nabhani, Khalid & Marriott, Hannah, 2020. "Examining consumer attitudes towards retailers' m-commerce mobile applications – An initial adoption vs. continuous use perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 139-157.
    14. Garaus, Marion & Wolfsteiner, Elisabeth & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Shoppers' acceptance and perceptions of electronic shelf labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3687-3692.
    15. Ivonne Angelica Castiblanco Jimenez & Laura Cristina Cepeda García & Maria Grazia Violante & Federica Marcolin & Enrico Vezzetti, 2020. "Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Xin Xu & Viswanath Venkatesh & Kar Yan Tam & Se-Joon Hong, 2010. "Model of Migration and Use of Platforms: Role of Hierarchy, Current Generation, and Complementarities in Consumer Settings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(8), pages 1304-1323, August.
    17. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    18. Juan F. Tavera Mesías & Juan C. Sánchez Giraldo & Bernardo Ballesteros Díaz, 2011. "Aceptación del E-Commerce en Colombia: un estudio para la ciudad de Medellín," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    19. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2015. "Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 127-142, February.
    20. Zhiqiang Yuan & Jing Liu & Xi Deng & Tianzi Ding & Tommy Tanu Wijaya, 2023. "Facilitating Conditions as the Biggest Factor Influencing Elementary School Teachers’ Usage Behavior of Dynamic Mathematics Software in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    21. Salvador Angosto & Jerónimo García-Fernández & Moisés Grimaldi-Puyana, 2023. "A systematic review of intention to use fitness apps (2020–2023)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:25:y:2024:i:1:p:117-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.