IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v24y2023i1p48-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negative Related Diversification, Positive Related Diversification and Firm’s Performance: Measurement and Application

Author

Listed:
  • Narander Kumar Nigam
  • C. P. Gupta

Abstract

Though we have had extensive theoretical and empirical studies on diversification during the past decades, yet the impact of diversification on a firm’s financial performance remains unclear. Earlier, authors (like Arnould, 1969 ; Berry, 1971 ; Gort, 1962 ) tried to answer the fundamental question of ‘whether a firm should diversify or not’, but were unable to reach any consensus. Rumelt (1974) categorized diversification into related and unrelated and concluded that diversification in a related area is better than being undiversified. Even after the seminal work of Rumelt, empirical evidence on the impact of both types of diversification on a firm’s financial performance is still mixed ( Berger & Ofek, 1995 ; Chen & Joseph Yu, 2012 ; Duin & Hansen, 1991 ; Palepu, 1985 ; Palich, Cardinal, & Miller, 2000 ). In this study, we make an attempt to answer the same fundamental question of ‘whether a firm should diversify or not’ by including three new aspects: first , we measure the impact of diversification (and its types) on the three aspects of a firm’s financial performance, that is, risk, return and risk-adjusted return; second , we measure this impact on lag 1 of diversification; and third , we use a newly developed approach, that is, correlation-based diversification measures ( Nigam & Gupta, 2018b ) to measure different types of diversification. Initially, our results indicated insignificant impact of diversification (and its types) on all firm performance measures. Later, we segregated related diversification (RD) into positive related diversification (PRD) and negative related diversification (NRD); then we measured the impact of each type of diversification separately and found that diversification is better than being undiversified only if it is into a negative related area. It is a new finding and may have some policy implications for the management while designing its diversification strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Narander Kumar Nigam & C. P. Gupta, 2023. "Negative Related Diversification, Positive Related Diversification and Firm’s Performance: Measurement and Application," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 48-67, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:24:y:2023:i:1:p:48-67
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150919886415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150919886415
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150919886415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Jensen, 1968. "The Performance Of Mutual Funds In The Period 1945–1964," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(2), pages 389-416, May.
    2. Jacquemin, Alexis P & Berry, Charles H, 1979. "Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 359-369, June.
    3. Michael Gort, 1962. "Diversification and Integration in American Industry," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number gort62-1.
    4. Berry, Charles H, 1971. "Corporate Growth and Diversification," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(2), pages 371-384, October.
    5. David W. Cobia & Paul L. Farris, 1969. "Mergers and Diversified Growth of Large Grain Firms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 51(3), pages 619-624.
    6. Richard P. Rumelt, 1982. "Diversification strategy and profitability," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 359-369, October.
    7. David J. Teece, 2003. "Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Essays In Technology Management And Policy Selected Papers of David J Teece, chapter 15, pages 419-446, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Michael Gort, 1962. "Introduction to "Diversification and Integration in American Industry"," NBER Chapters, in: Diversification and Integration in American Industry, pages 3-7, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Chen, Chiung-Jung & Yu, Chwo-Ming Joseph, 2012. "Managerial ownership, diversification, and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 518-534.
    10. Leslie E. Palich & Laura B. Cardinal & C. Chet Miller, 2000. "Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 155-174, February.
    11. Petersen, Mitchell A & Rajan, Raghuram G, 1994. "The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(1), pages 3-37, March.
    12. Krishna Palepu, 1985. "Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 239-255, July.
    13. Sanjeev Dewan & Fei Ren, 2011. "Information Technology and Firm Boundaries: Impact on Firm Risk and Return Performance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 369-388, June.
    14. Sattar A. Mansi & David M. Reeb, 2002. "Corporate Diversification: What Gets Discounted?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(5), pages 2167-2183, October.
    15. Lecraw, Donald J, 1984. "Diversification Strategy and Performance," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 179-198, December.
    16. Richard A. Bettis & Vijay Mahajan, 1985. "Risk/Return Performance of Diversified Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(7), pages 785-799, July.
    17. Jonchi Shyu & Yen-Luan Chen, 2009. "Diversification, Performance, and the Corporate Life Cycle," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 57-68, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narander Kumar Nigam & C. P. Gupta, 2021. "Correlation-based Diversification and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation of India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(2), pages 442-458, April.
    2. Guerras-Martín, Luis Ángel & Ronda-Pupo, Guillermo Armando & Zúñiga-Vicente, José Ángel & Benito-Osorio, Diana, 2020. "Half a century of research on corporate diversification: A new comprehensive framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 124-141.
    3. Zinnia Mitra Bose & Indrani Chakraborty, 2022. "Effects of diversification on firm performance: an analysis of Indian firms," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 469-511, December.
    4. Adrian Lüthge, 2020. "The concept of relatedness in diversification research: review and synthesis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-35, February.
    5. Aparna Bhatia & Anu Thakur, 2016. "Diversification Strategies of Multi-national and Domestic Companies in India: A Comparative Evaluation in the Dynamic Environment," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 41(3), pages 199-215, August.
    6. Emanuele Pugliese & Lorenzo Napolitano & Andrea Zaccaria & Luciano Pietronero, 2019. "Coherent diversification in corporate technological portfolios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Tyson B. Mackey & Jay B. Barney & Jeffrey P. Dotson, 2017. "Corporate diversification and the value of individual firms: A Bayesian approach," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 322-341, February.
    8. Chen, Chiung-Jung & Yu, Chwo-Ming Joseph, 2012. "Managerial ownership, diversification, and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 518-534.
    9. Nicola Cetorelli & Michael G. Jacobides & Samuel Stern, 2021. "Mapping a sector's scope transformation and the value of following the evolving core," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(12), pages 2294-2327, December.
    10. Sharad Asthana, 2017. "Diversification by the audit offices in the US and its impact on audit quality," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1003-1030, May.
    11. López Zapata, Esteban & García Muiña, Fernando Enrique & García, Susana María, 2019. "Analysing the relationship between diversification strategy and firm performance: the role of the economic cycle," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    12. Sharad Asthana, 2013. "Diversification By The Audit Office And Its Impact On Audit Quality," Working Papers 0152acc, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    13. Gemba, Kiminori & Kodama, Fumio, 2001. "Diversification dynamics of the Japanese industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1165-1184, October.
    14. Forcadell, Francisco Javier, 2007. "Corporate diversification and R&D intensity dynamics," UC3M Working papers. Economics we078249, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    15. Alonso-Borrego, César & Forcadell, Francisco Javier, 2010. "Related diversification and R&D intensity dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 537-548, May.
    16. Emanuele Pugliese & Lorenzo Napolitano & Andrea Zaccaria & Luciano Pietronero, 2017. "Coherent diversification in corporate technological portfolios," Papers 1707.02188, arXiv.org.
    17. David J. Bryce & Sidney G. Winter, 2009. "A General Interindustry Relatedness Index," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(9), pages 1570-1585, September.
    18. Mudambi, Ram & Swift, Tim, 2011. "Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 429-440, April.
    19. Piaskowska, D., 2005. "Essays on firm growth and value creation," Other publications TiSEM 89053610-79c6-4c52-9d1c-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Lin, Hsing-Er & Hsu, I-Chieh & Hsu, Audrey Wenhsin & Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2020. "Creating competitive advantages: Interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:24:y:2023:i:1:p:48-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.