IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v4y1980i4p507-535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Impact Assessment as Evaluation Research

Author

Listed:
  • Errol Meidinger

    (Lewis and Clark Law School Portland, Oregon)

  • Allan Schnaiberg

    (Northwestern University)

Abstract

The emerging practice of social impact assessment (SIA) faces a number of difficult methodological and operational questions. One way of addressing them is to look to the experience of the more developed field of evaluation research (ER). The convergences with and extensions of ER by SIA pose the questions addressed by this article. It argues among other things: (1) until the existing problems of essentially ex post ER are more adequately understood and resolved it may be untenable to continue some of the ex ante pretensions current in SIA; (2) because of a larger private sector role and agency mission orientations, SIA may be even more plagued with one-sided research the ER These and other issues are critically examined, and a number of possible responses suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Errol Meidinger & Allan Schnaiberg, 1980. "Social Impact Assessment as Evaluation Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 4(4), pages 507-535, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:4:y:1980:i:4:p:507-535
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8000400405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8000400405
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8000400405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Kershaw, "undated". "A Negative Income Tax Experiment," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 75baa942aabd4275a8cc2e8b8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saileshsingh Gunessee & Tom Lane, 2020. "Is Economics An Experimental Science? A Textbook Perspective," Discussion Papers 2020-16, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    2. Walter Nicholson & Sonia R. Wright, 1977. "Participants' Understanding of the Treatment in Policy Experimentation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 1(2), pages 245-268, May.
    3. Donald T. Campbell & Robert F. Boruch & Richard D. Schwartz & Joseph Steinberg, 1977. "Confidentiality-Preserving Modes of Access To Files and To Interfile Exchange for Useful Statistical Analysis," Evaluation Review, , vol. 1(2), pages 269-300, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:4:y:1980:i:4:p:507-535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.