IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v49y2025i3p511-563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theory Use in Project Management Research: An Exploratory Content Analysis Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Erastus Karanja
  • Jigish Zaveri
  • Angela K. Miles
  • Steven Day

Abstract

The frequency and richness of the theories developed, tested, and used by researchers in an academic discipline exemplify several pertinent factors, namely, the growth, the maturity, the independence, the legitimacy, and the influence of the discipline. Although organizations have been working on projects for centuries, Project Management (PM) is a considerably new academic discipline with emerging research themes, models, methodologies, frameworks, and paradigms. These PM concepts are anchored on or reinforced by new or existing theories. This exploratory study aims to add to the existing PM body of knowledge by investigating the prevalence of theory use in PM research. A systematic content analysis of 9200 PM research articles published from 2000 to 2019 (20Â years) in the leading PM journals identified 248 unique theories. These results reveal that the PM discipline is increasingly embracing the use of theories with game theory, fuzzy theory, agency theory, contingency theory, and stakeholder theory emerging as the most dominant theories in the reviewed research articles. Also, although PM is developing its theories, the results revealed that PM researchers continue to heavily use theories borrowed from other academic disciplines such as psychology, sociology, mathematics, and economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Erastus Karanja & Jigish Zaveri & Angela K. Miles & Steven Day, 2025. "Theory Use in Project Management Research: An Exploratory Content Analysis Approach," Evaluation Review, , vol. 49(3), pages 511-563, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:511-563
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X241279706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X241279706
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X241279706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:511-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.