IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v39y2015i1p82-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Survey on Characteristics of Japanese Academic Job Market and Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Koji Domon
  • Yoshihiro Kitamura

Abstract

Background: During the Meiji era, at the end of the 19th century, Japan introduced western systems into many fields, economically developing later than other industrially developed countries. Japan introduced a higher education system modeled on the German system, focusing not on education but on research. The historical background has shaped contemporary Japanese academia differently from that of the United States and the European Union. In addition, because of geographical and linguistic barriers in Asia, intercommunication with researchers in other developed countries has been much less than that between the United States and the European Union, leaving Japanese academia relatively isolated. Method: We survey the characteristics of the Japanese academic system in higher education, using the latest published data. Result: This article indicates a concentration of research at former imperial universities and a rigidity of movement among universities both internationally and domestically. Furthermore, small differences in salary levels have provided little incentive to perform research. However, while most universities in Japan have not introduced evaluation systems for promotion and salary that are heavily dependent on journal rankings, as in the European Union and United States, Japanese academic performance has not declined. Conclusion: This article suggests that in Japan, salary incentives, the impact factor, and so on have had little influence on academic performance. Even though cultural and historical differences between countries affect academic behaviors, we hope that this article might trigger consideration of other possible evaluation schemes for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Koji Domon & Yoshihiro Kitamura, 2015. "A Survey on Characteristics of Japanese Academic Job Market and Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 39(1), pages 82-101, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:39:y:2015:i:1:p:82-101
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X14565176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X14565176
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X14565176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:39:y:2015:i:1:p:82-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.