IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v28y2004i3p218-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Outlook is G.R.E.A.T

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Peterson
  • Finn-Aage Esbensen

Abstract

This article reports on a survey of administrators, counselors, and teachers from middle schools involved in the National Evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training(G.R.E.A.T.) program. This survey was part of a multisite evaluation that also elicited the responses of students, parents, and officers teaching the G.R.E.A.T. program. School personnel provide their views about important current issues, including their perceptions of school safety, the role of law enforcement officers in schools, and the role and effectiveness of school-based prevention programs in general and the G.R.E.A.T. program in particular. Results from this survey have important implications for the plethora of prevention programs currently located in American schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Peterson & Finn-Aage Esbensen, 2004. "The Outlook is G.R.E.A.T," Evaluation Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 218-245, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:28:y:2004:i:3:p:218-245
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X03262598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X03262598
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X03262598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick Aniskiewicz & Earl Wysong, 1990. "Evaluating Dare: Drug Education And The Multiple Meanings Of Success," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 9(4), pages 727-747, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis J. Palumbo & Jennifer L. Ferguson, 1995. "Evaluating Gang Resistance Education and Training (Great)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(6), pages 597-619, December.
    2. L. Thomas Winfree JR & Finn-Aage Esbensen & D. Wayne Osgood, 1996. "Evaluating a School-Based Gang-Prevention Program," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(2), pages 181-203, April.
    3. Christine S. Sellers & Terrance J. Taylor & Finn-Aage Esbensen, 1998. "Reality Check," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(5), pages 590-608, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:28:y:2004:i:3:p:218-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.