IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v26y2002i1p59-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Privatization of “Long Arm†Service of Process

Author

Listed:
  • Scot Schraufnagel

    (Florida State University)

Abstract

The research addresses questions about the desirability of privatizing a key component of the child support enforcement process, namely, the serving of legal documents or “service of process†for cases in which the noncustodial parent is living in another state. Child support enforcement cases that require this type of “long arm†service of process were randomly assigned to a private vendor and to out-of-state sheriff offices using an experimental research design. The author finds that although there is no difference in the time it took the two groups to process cases, the private vendor was more successful, on average, at performing this function. Furthermore, he finds that the higher success rate of the private vendor is sufficient to produce a substantively important increase in collections in child support enforcement cases. Additional questions about the suitability of privatizing “service of process†and other like services are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Scot Schraufnagel, 2002. "Testing Privatization of “Long Arm†Service of Process," Evaluation Review, , vol. 26(1), pages 59-80, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:26:y:2002:i:1:p:59-80
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X02026001003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X02026001003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X02026001003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bos, Dieter, 1991. "Privatization: A Theoretical Treatment," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198283690.
    2. Cheng, Li-Ping Alfred, 1996. "Ownership, Control, and Privatization of Public Enterprises," Occasional Papers 256373, Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N.F. Cruz & R.C. Marques & A. Marra & C. Pozzi, 2014. "Local Mixed Companies: The Theory And Practice In An International Perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(1), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Kangsik Choi, 2006. "Mixed Motives of Simultaneous-move Games in a Mixed Duopoly," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 12(14), pages 1-7.
    3. Boudreaux, Christopher, 2019. "Do private enterprises outperform state enterprises in an emerging market? The importance of institutional context in entrepreneurship," MPRA Paper 93039, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Alberto Cavaliere & Simona Scabrosetti, 2008. "Privatization And Efficiency: From Principals And Agents To Political Economy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 685-710, September.
    5. Dmitri Vinogradov & Elena Shadrina, 2018. "Public-Private Partnerships as Collaborative Projects: Testing the Theory on Cases from EU and Russia," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5-6), pages 446-459, April.
    6. Ai Tee Loh & Booi Hon Kam & John T. Jackson, 2003. "Sri Lanka's plantation sector: a before-and-after privatization comparison," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(6), pages 727-745.
    7. Denis Claude & Mabel Tidball, 2010. "Efficiency inducing taxation for polluting oligopolists: the irrelevance of privatization," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(4), pages 2946-2954.
    8. Mohamed Jellal & François-Charles Wolff, 2003. "Privatisation et négociation collective," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 11(1), pages 73-99.
    9. Kangsik Choi & Yuanzhu Lu, 2009. "A Model Of Endogenous Payoff Motives And Endogenous Timing In A Mixed Duopoly," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 203-223, September.
    10. Misganaw Badasa, 2019. "Has Privatization Promoted Efficiency in Ethiopia?: A Panel Data Analysis on Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing Firms," Economic Research Guardian, Weissberg Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 55-74, December.
    11. Oum, Tae H. & Adler, Nicole & Yu, Chunyan, 2006. "Privatization, Corporatization, Ownership Forms and their Effects on the Performance of the World’s Major Airports," 47th Annual Transportation Research Forum, New York, New York, March 23-25, 2006 208026, Transportation Research Forum.
    12. Choi, Kangsik, 2012. "Indirect Taxation and Privatization in a Model of Government's Preference," MPRA Paper 42968, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Kangsik Choi, 2023. "Endogenous organizational form in a multiproduct mixed duopoly," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 279-299, April.
    14. Ofelia Betancor & María Paz Espinosa, 2015. "Privatización, competencia y regulación aeroportuaria:experiencia internacional," Working Papers 2015-03, FEDEA.
    15. Luca Pareschi & Edoardo Mollona, 2016. "No country for neoliberalism: a topic modeling approach to protean discourses to resist privatizations in Italy," Working Papers 7, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    16. Anke S. Kessler & Christoph Lülfesmann, 2002. "Monitoring and Productive Efficiency in Public and Private Firms," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 58(2), pages 167-187, February.
    17. Leka, Edmond, 1994. "Power industry in Albania and its way through the reform to market economies. Program in Applied Economics," East European Series 6, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    18. Tomaru, Yoshihiro, 2010. "A Public Firm's R&D Policy and Trade Liberalization," MPRA Paper 28173, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Oum, Tae H. & Yan, Jia & Yu, Chunyan, 2008. "Ownership forms matter for airport efficiency: A stochastic frontier investigation of worldwide airports," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 422-435, September.
    20. Oum, Tae H. & Adler, Nicole & Yu, Chunyan, 2006. "Privatization, corporatization, ownership forms and their effects on the performance of the world's major airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 109-121.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:26:y:2002:i:1:p:59-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.