IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v25y2001i6p583-604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing Overclaiming in Needs Assessment Studies an Experimental Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Calsyn

    (University of Missouri–St. Louis)

  • William L. Kelemen

    (University of Missouri–St. Louis)

  • E. Terrence Jones

    (University of Missouri–St. Louis)

  • Joel P. Winter

    (University of Missouri–St. Louis)

Abstract

A randomized experiment investigated the effect of various instructional sets on reducing agency awareness overclaiming, that is, claiming knowledge of fictitious agencies. As predicted, respondents who were warned that the list contained fake agencies exhibited less agency awareness overclaiming than respondents who were not warned. However, providing respondents a memory retrieval strategy had no effect on agency awareness overclaiming. A multivariate model, which included demographic variables, response style variables, and knowledge variables, explained 40% of the variance of agency awareness overclaiming.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Calsyn & William L. Kelemen & E. Terrence Jones & Joel P. Winter, 2001. "Reducing Overclaiming in Needs Assessment Studies an Experimental Comparison," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(6), pages 583-604, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:25:y:2001:i:6:p:583-604
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0102500601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X0102500601
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X0102500601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torbjørn Moum, 1988. "Yea-saying and mood-of-the-day effects in self-reported quality of life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 117-139, April.
    2. Goldsmith, Ronald E., 1988. "Spurious response error in a new product survey," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 271-281, November.
    3. Calsyn, Robert J., 1995. "Predicting agency awareness acquiescence in physicians," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 343-347.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margaret Denton & Jenny Ploeg & Joseph Tindale & Brian Hutchison & Kevin Brazil & Noori Akhtar-Danesh & Monica Quinlan, 2009. "Where Would You Turn For Help? Older Adults’ Knowledge and Awareness of Community Support Services," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 244, McMaster University.
    2. Margaret Denton & Jenny Ploeg & Joseph Tindale & Brian Hutchison & Kevin Brazil, & Noori Akhtar-Danesh & Monica Quinlan, 2009. "Where Would You Turn For Help? Older Adults’ Knowledge and Awareness of Community Support Services," Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population Research Reports 430, McMaster University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert J. Calsyn & Joel P. Winter, 1999. "Understanding and Controlling Response Bias in Needs Assessment Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 23(4), pages 399-417, August.
    2. J.J. Ehrhardt & W.E. Saris & R. Veenhoven, 2000. "Stability of Life-satisfaction over Time," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 177-205, June.
    3. Ali Ardeshiri & Joffre Swait & Elizabeth C. Heagney & Mladen Kovac, 2019. "Preserve or retreat? Willingness-to-pay for Coastline Protection in New South Wales," Papers 1902.03310, arXiv.org.
    4. Dolnicar, Sara & Grün, Bettina & Leisch, Friedrich, 2016. "Increasing sample size compensates for data problems in segmentation studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 992-999.
    5. Raymond Y. T. Yeung & Richard D. Smith & Lai‐Ming Ho & Janice M. Johnston & Gabriel M. Leung, 2006. "Empirical implications of response acquiescence in discrete‐choice contingent valuation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(10), pages 1077-1089, October.
    6. Ardeshiri, Ali & Rashidi, Taha Hossein, 2020. "Willingness to pay for fast charging station for electric vehicles with limited market penetration making," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Robert J. Calsyn & W. Dean Klinkenberg, 1995. "Response Bias in Needs Assessment Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(2), pages 217-225, April.
    8. Bae, Jeong Hwan & Rishi, Meenakshi & Li, Dmitriy, 2021. "Consumer preferences for a green certificate program in South Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:25:y:2001:i:6:p:583-604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.